You know that they aren't milling anything don't you?Wind Mill companies collapsing, a bit like their Mills in a big blow, going, going, gone.![]()
You know that they aren't milling anything don't you?Wind Mill companies collapsing, a bit like their Mills in a big blow, going, going, gone.![]()
The problem is that the very popular large vans like Renault Master and Mercedes Sprinter become too heavy when you fit a battery to them, so they come under HGV class. Now, you have to MOT them after one year, not three, and you can't find an MOT station qualified to do the MOT on them.I thought category B drivers can drive petrol/diesel vans up to 3.5T and electric vans up to 4.5T.
The idea is to allow up to 1T of battery weight for the same load carrying capacity. Potentially, electric vans can carry up to a tonne more if your battery pack weighs less than a tonne.
Have I got it wrong?
Where's that then?...you can buy them brand new with a 70% discount!
Renault dealer.Where's that then?
Did the Guardian receeive money from USAID?The vindictive lunatic goes further -
Trump imposes sanctions on officials at the International Criminal Court.
![]()
Trump's sanctions condemned by ICC and Court vows to continue 'providing justice'
The International Criminal Court says Trump's executive order seeks to harm its "impartial judicial work".www.bbc.co.uk
Loading…
www.theguardian.com
![]()
Trump's sanctions will hit the ICC hard
As a supporter of the ICC, I regret that its credibility has – at a stroke – been grievously diminished by this exercise of prejudicewww.spectator.co.uk
This response is a classic example of what is called 'deflection'.Did the Guardian receeive money from USAID?
1. It is entirely irrelevantDeflection is a tactic used in arguments to avoid criticism or blame by shifting the focus to another person or issue. It's a psychological defence mechanism that people use to protect themselves from uncomfortable challenges.
Can you point me at your source for the deflection definition? Could be useful in a situation I'm involved in.This response is a classic example of what is called 'deflection'.
1. It is entirely irrelevant
2. I supplied both left and right wing references to Trump's action
3. It has no relevance to the matter raised
You might have as well asked, 'Do you beat your wife?'
Maybe this link is one you might actually consider opening:
Loading…
www.foxnews.com
PM sent.Can you point me at your source for the deflection definition? Could be useful in a situation I'm involved in.
It's just a question. What's the answer then?This response is a classic example of what is called 'deflection'.
1. It is entirely irrelevant
2. I supplied both left and right wing references to Trump's action
3. It has no relevance to the matter raised
You might have as well asked, 'Do you beat your wife?'
Maybe this link is one you might actually consider opening:
Loading…
www.foxnews.com
Yes. It's been done for at least 5 decades. Nothing sinister in that. Governments pay subscriptions in place of direct grants to help with costs to generate content for public good. It's a tiny fraction of the budget, it doesn't cover the entire beneficiaries ' own costs.It's just a question. What's the answer then?
The question is irrelevant to the discussion. A variery of sources reported the irrational decision. I posted links to them. The relevant matter is that Trump has placed sanctions on people who work for the International court which investigates and holds to account international criminals like Putin and Netanyahu. THAT is the issue, NOT one of the news organisations who reported Trump's actions.It's just a question. What's the answer then?
How would you handle it then, when you know that there's corruption in these government agencies, you stood for election on the promise of sorting it out, and got democratically voted in by a large margin?The question is irrelevant to the discussion. A variery of sources reported the irrational decision. I posted links to them. The relevant matter is that Trump has placed sanctions on people who work for the International court which investigates and holds to account international criminals like Putin and Netanyahu. THAT is the issue, NOT one of the news organisations who reported Trump's actions.
I'm surprised you are so interested in something else that is not connected.
Yes - it is a question, but it is a deflection.
you make a pig's ear out of it, declaring that all the old institutions are a waste of money. All we need is a sovereign fund.How would you handle it then, when you know that there's corruption in these government agencies, you stood for election on the promise of sorting it out, and got democratically voted in by a large margin?
What corruption do you know of at the International Criminal Court?How would you handle it then, when you know that there's corruption in these government agencies, you stood for election on the promise of sorting it out, and got democratically voted in by a large margin?