There is a ridiculous idea gaining ground in the UK that we are somehow entitled to have money handed to us from the hardworking and successful people because they got too much.
It's not a ridiculous idea or confined to the UK, it has long been widely accepted as necessary. The reason it is necessary was the invention of money and the ownership that money can buy.
Before money, when our needs were more basic for such as food, shelter and warmth, the ratio of individual consumption was quite narrow. The man with lots of food couldn't eat hundreds or thousands of times as much food as a man with little food. He could only sleep under one roof, only sit before one fire. These were the natural order.
The invention of money has made possible, and indeed commonplace, obscene levels of possession far beyond any individual need. The power that gives inevitably results in greed and abuse of that power, impoverishing to varying degrees the majority without that power. At its worst it has historically led to the lifespans of the rich being double those of the poor and even today there are large discrepancies of lifespan between rich and poor areas, due simply to poverty.
Left unchecked such inequality can eventually lead to such as the rule of the Romanovs in Russia and the violent correction that resulted, only to lead to the equal extremes of Stalin and Nicolae Ceaușescu. But all that can be avoided simply by correcting the distortion of the natural order that money introduced, levelling out the amounts and power that individuals can acquire.
Truly mature societies like those in Scandinavia learnt long ago the evils of power, Norway, Sweden and Denmark all at war with each other and each at times in the ascendant and ruling over the others. With that experience they've learnt a better way, not seeking power individually or collectively, but each country and individual instead being willing to share what they have for the overall good.
That is not communism, it's socialism.
.