It appears Danidl you inhabit the same space as flecc.
From my earlier studies , as a physicist , that is only possible if we have different spins... Which seems about right.
If your question to me is where can I reference that the deal with the EU \ UK will be less favourable... The following report in the telegraph detailing a talk by Mr Barnier....recently .
The phrase "benefits of the single market " should be a clear indication....
The chief negotiator said the EU might judge some UK rules as “equivalent” to EU passporting rights but ruled out the City of London having access to EU financial markets under the same passporting deal as now.
Mr Barnier told the audience at the Centre for European Reform: “Those who claim that the UK should pick parts of the single market must stop this contradiction. The single market is a package, with four indivisible freedoms, common rules, institutions, and enforcement structures.
“The UK knows these rules very well, like the back of its hand. It has contributed to defining them over the last 44 years with a certain degree of influence. We took note of the UK decisions to end free movement of people and this means clearly that the UK will lose the benefits of the single market.
“This is a legal reality; the EU does not want to punish, it simply draws the logical consequence of the UK decision to take back control.”
As well as ruling out a carve-out for the financial sector, Mr Barnier appeared to suggest there could be no special deal for the UK's car manufacturers to stay in the single market, as proposed by industry bodies.
In the same speech the senior EU official also expressed disappointment at what he suggested as a fixation in some British circles on "no deal" being a viable option for the UK.
"We have a shared history and this started long before the last 44 years. This is why the no deal is not our scenario, even though we will be ready for it," he said.
"I regret that this ‘no deal’ option comes up so often in the UK public debate. Only those who want to ignore the current benefits of EU membership can say that no deal would be a positive result."
Liberal Democrat leader Vince Cable said the decision was a "major blow" to the Government's Brexit plans.
“Loss of this access risks blowing a hole in the budget at a time when our public services are already seriously underfunded," he said.
“All of this could be avoided if the government chose to stay in the single market.
“Instead ministers seem intent on killing the golden goose, by choosing an extreme form of Brexit that will seriously damage the financial sector
