An admission from you at last! Well said.Predictable and pathetic.
oldtom, please remind me what this thread is about?
You seem to spend your time to represent the AAV blog and rant against social inequalities.
Stay on topic please. Your attempt to link brexit to inequalities and other prejudices are nothing more than your own prejudices.
If you can't stick to logical debate then start another one to talk about what you want to talk about.
let's fast forward to March 2023.Two questions that require answers are these
What if anything will result from Brexit that bears any resemblance to the promises made by the leave campaign to sway the vote their way?
Does anyone really believe that any Government or alternative party that takes power has the foresight, patience, willingness to invest and make changes, and the courage to turn this country into a place where all members of the people live happy and productive lives within the framework of the next 25 years?
Anyone care to comment?
that's correct, oldtom. I don't care for the right wing media, they have never affected me, I can't see why I should pay any attention to them.You seem resolutely determined to see no connection between the the far-right fascists running this country in the absence of a strong opposition, the right wing media bombarding the British public with propaganda and the fact that these are the people leading the nation into economic and political isolation.
The second part of this isn't necessarily true. The Great Repeal Bill passes into UK law a large number of past measures which contain references to various EU bodies including the ECJ as being the arbiters in certain circumstances. It follows that we will still be subject until such time as parliament gets to examine and amend such measures as the difficulties arise. That will take very much longer than the under six years to 2023. Parliament will probably be dealing with them for well over a decade yet and there's general agreement among lawyers that this will never be fully completed.let's fast forward to March 2023.
The UK has finally stopped paying into the EU budget and no longer subjected to decision taken at the ECJ.
We will stop being taken to the ECJ by businesses. Even so, I reckon the ECJ may still retain its superiority in arbitrations regarding a future FTA.That will take very much longer than the under six years to 2023.
It's really more of a question of what sort of state the people are in rather than the Government that matters.let's fast forward to March 2023.
The UK has finally stopped paying into the EU budget and no longer subjected to decision taken at the ECJ.
Whether the government at the time is a good one, I have no way of knowing until nearer to the time (May 2020) and about the quality of the next administration, that depends very much on who you are going to vote for in 2020.
Brexit is unsatisfactory to both sides through reality creeping in .We will stop being taken to the ECJ by businesses. Even so, I reckon the ECJ may still retain its superiority in arbitrations regarding a future FTA.
When Mrs May made the ECJ a redline, I originally thought the hard brexiters had won it but afterward, came to the same conclusion, we have to leave the Single Market and the Customs Union for brexit to succeed or fail. The middle ground, Customs Union, will be unsatisfactory for both sides.
Because of the effect they have had on mass opinion by obscuring the truth with lies, that is the reason to take notice of them.I can't see why I should pay any attention to them.
If you were a brexiter, you would want such statement be proven by real fact.Brexit is unsatisfactory to both sides through reality creeping in .
do you want to dictate to people which newspapers they must read?Because of the effect they have had on mass opinion by obscuring the truth with lies, that is the reason to take notice of them.
How about this one thenIf you were a brexiter, you would want such statement be proven by real fact.
No, but what I would like to see is that they are required to report the news not just party propaganda and be independent as they claim to be.do you want to dictate to people which newspapers they must read?
these are practical measures. The wealth of this country is built mostly if not totally by immigrants and exploitation of colonies. It follows that future prosperity continues on the basis of immigration. I can't see any sensible government is going to stop immigration. Brexit puts the responsibility to manage immigration with the government of the day, rather than allowing them to hide behind 'it's the EU's fault'.How about this one then
The government is insisting on the continuation of free movement of EU trained people.
Because they will not fund the expensive education of our own children.
Or how about there will not be the £350 million going to the NHS
How many facts will it take?
Had you forgotten that you wanted to curtail my freedom of speech here:I accept freedom of speech like everyone else, even if they talk rubbish.
The topic necessarily requires comment on the people responsible for the passage of 'Brexit' so I have never really been off topic. You need to make up your mind about whether you do or do not accept freedom of speech, or is it the case perhaps that it's only OK when it suits you?You seem to spend your time to represent the AAV blog and rant against social inequalities.
Stay on topic please. Your attempt to link brexit to inequalities and other prejudices are nothing more than your own prejudices.
You know what, freedoms have a price. Nothing new.No, but what I would like to see is that they are required to report the news not just party propaganda and be independent as they claim to be.
What is wrong with that?
No, I did not.Had you forgotten that you wanted to curtail my freedom of speech here:
Are you now saying that the majority of those who voted for 'Brexit' expressly for racist reasons - no more foreigners here - were conned?The wealth of this country is built mostly if not totally by immigrants and exploitation of colonies. It follows that future prosperity continues on the basis of immigration. I can't see any sensible government is going to stop immigration. Brexit puts the responsibility to manage immigration with the government of the day, rather than allowing them to hide behind 'it's the EU's fault'.