Ok, lets look at bike shops as an example. Even those who don't sell oversea's benefit in many ways.The enlighten us with examples that the EU benefits a large number of small businesses that don't trade in other countries.
Big shops can afford buying teams, Wiggle for instance have a team of buyers based full time in the Far East.
Being in the EU, allow UK bike shops to buy from suppliers across the continent. Economies of scale mean and competition mean that small bike shops can now easily buy from these suppliers in small quantities because shipping and trading with the the EU is so easy. It doesn't count as importing, so no paperwork, no delays etc etc. So even if they don't sell overseas everything they buy be it direct from EU suppliers or from companies like mine who buy from the EU, its cheaper and easier for them. 2 important benefits.
This means they can compete with the big guys, so benefiting small businesses.
a high % of bike shops also employ EU workers to fill positions because there are not enough decent mechanics in the UK. No admin needed.
European standards benefit out industry in many many ways.
The size of the EU protects and supports our UK brands against dumping of Chinese bikes into the UK. Do you think Brompton would be doing so well if it didn't have the EU protection of tariffs against China?
I could go on and on and on.
I'm sure you've lost tenders before, what I'm saying is don't blame the EU, because if you're doing that you're going to run out of an excuse in a couple of years when you loose future ones.I have lost tenders before, stick to the reason I have given and don't try to link this example some personal issues - that is the kind of tactics that I will never use in a debate.
Competition is healthy but it comes at a cost. Are you going to argue with that too?
Of course it comes at a cost... its you who seem to have a problem with that cost and are trying to build a wall to protect yourself.