May's deal or remain would result in a massive boycott by all the leave voters.
that's what the Libdems count on.May's deal or remain would result in a massive boycott by all the leave voters.
I agree but that could mean remain win with a lot less than 17.4 million votes. Making the result look like a farce.that's what the Libdems count on.
that's the agendaI think the option of no deal will also be on the ballot paper. That will split leave votes.
Isnt that the case with all MEPs?at least they are consistent.
They see Brussels as a giant gravy train, turn up when you want, claim back all your expenses, good pay and a very generous pension scheme.
so why not jump on.
no, 4 out of 5 MEPs do contribute to make better laws instead of leaving it to the Commission and their directives.Isnt that the case with all MEPs?
I agree but that could mean remain win with a lot less than 17.4 million votes. Making the result look like a farce.
It will look bad for Leave whichever way it's decided for the ballot paper choices in any second referendum.that's the agenda
Wonderful! (sorry!)May's deal or remain would result in a massive boycott by all the leave voters.
they will have to include it in some form.But will parliament agree to a second referendum with No Deal on the ballot paper, given their overwhelming opposition to No Deal?
But some of them actually turn up and work occasionally.Isnt that the case with all MEPs?
exactly why there should not be a second ref. It is just a means to manipulate the vote and overturn the original democratic resultIt will look bad for Leave whichever way it's decided for the ballot paper choices in any second referendum.
Either Leavers boycotting in protest with No Deal excluded, many of them already saying they'll never vote again; or the Leave vote split by two leave choices being included.
.
Democratic result? really? who are you kidding, it was fixed, and everyone knows that, but the leave camp pretend not to, as there's money to be made out of this mad idea of Brexit.exactly why there should not be a second ref. It is just a means to manipulate the vote and overturn the original democratic result
Dear oh dear. Losing really has warped your ability to think rationally. There was nothing 'fixed'. We wanted out. We won the argument. Take back control.Democratic result? really? who are you kidding, it was fixed, and everyone knows that, but the leave camp pretend not to, as there's money to be made out of this mad idea of Brexit.
Using Military grade psi ops techniques to motivate the most vulnerable to suggestion because you have stolen their data, isn't democratic by even the wildest stretch of the imagination.
It's criminal.
I remember Farage saying he was going to pull the Tory party apart limb by limb. He's actually doing it. And he's going to do it to the Labour party too. What a time to be alive.Democratic result? really? who are you kidding, it was fixed, and everyone knows that, but the leave camp pretend not to, as there's money to be made out of this mad idea of Brexit.
Using Military grade psi ops techniques to motivate the most vulnerable to suggestion because you have stolen their data, isn't democratic by even the wildest stretch of the imagination.
It's criminal.
From the Telegraph:Democratic result? really? who are you kidding, it was fixed, and everyone knows that, but the leave camp pretend not to, as there's money to be made out of this mad idea of Brexit. Using Military grade psi ops techniques to motivate the most vulnerable to suggestion because you have stolen their data, isn't democratic by even the wildest stretch of the imagination. It's criminal.
we should really separate the EP vote from the next GE, but for argument sake, if Farage manages to build a proper party with a program for government, he would have taken about half of the conservative voters and about 20% of the Labour voters.It will be interesting to see where this goes