Could is indeed the word. Have you observed ukips leadership theatricals? They excel at producing nutcases.
It’s the labour thugs that target the women journalists in the main.
Could is indeed the word. Have you observed ukips leadership theatricals? They excel at producing nutcases.
I agree with that. They prefer to go around in big cowardly mobs setting fire to things, attacking people going about their lawful business, and generally being a set of useless idiots being manipulated by dubious forcesThat has been scientifically proven to not be the case. Something in the genes of right wing fanatics apparently. Left wing fanatics do bad stuff in groups but not as loners.
whoCould is indeed the word. Have you observed ukips leadership theatricals? They excel at producing nutcases.
Heyy Fingers,... you been out on the shooting range again... i`m disappointed!
View attachment 29290
that`s slack grouping.... much too low, you can do better!
Where do I start? It's wall to wall nutcases at ukip.
All designed for his own aggrandisement, but achieve nothingvery easy to criticize but at least he did get in talks which was a lot more than Saint Obama did
They already know how to fail miserably but put on a show, thank you very much.A lesson for our spineless weak-kneed government on how to Walk Away from dictators..
"You have to be prepared to walk!"
Trump gives Theresa May a lesson in negotiation, walking away from an intransigent dictator, whilst May embraces hers.
View attachment 29285
That was quite an insightful breakdown of this, your last post,Danidl tries to add necessary details to give a clearer assessment , nothing wrong with that.It's more than extraordinary, its fantastic.
I usually find that the most intelligent people have a gift for taking a complex situation and effortlessly breaking it down into simple and more easily understood chunks. I find Danidl does quite the reverse. He takes a relatively simple situation, adds in irrelevant complications and then re-assembles the entire package into something which is much more complicated than it was at the outset. He then tries to explain his newly manufactured complexity using unnecessarily obscure words and language. This causes him to confuses himself resulting in an incoherent mess on the pages of this thread. I quite like it for its comedy value.
But returning to your original statement, yes, I think he does lack self awareness and is consumed by his own self importance, which is also extremely funny.
The accusations of trolling which you repeteatedly make when anything is posted that you disagree with is like your very own Irish backstop situation. When you run out of words and sentences, you default to the “you’re trolling” backstop, not just with me, but with anyone who has an opinion which differs to your own.Whats with the sudden outbreak of trolling?it comes across as pathetic attempts to compensate for fundamental lack of self esteem.
Almost there, but if you try again you will see that I said “adds in irrelevant complications”. This is something very different to adding necessary detail.That was quite an insightful breakdown of this, your last post,Danidl tries to add necessary details to give a clearer assessment , nothing wrong with that.
Sorry, point taken, you weren’t to know I was referring to David Lammy MP, who is a dreadful racist. They way he has hijacked a charitable cause and stained it with racist remarks in order to raise his own profile is awful.The discussion had been on anti-semitism so I replied factually on that subject citing the Jewish view. Your above response is totally unwarranted.
And how am I to know what you were thinking of if you don't state it? I'm not psychic.
And I don't agree, Lammy is absolutely right.
.
No, trolling is when one launches personal attacks on another poster. Instead of arguing the facts, remaining on topic. As you do, very often, including in your reply to me, when you run out of valid arguments, as you also do, frequently. Outside a prep school playground, it is very boring.The accusations of trolling which you repeteatedly make when anything is posted that you disagree with is like your very own Irish backstop situation. When you run out of words and sentences, you default to the “you’re trolling” backstop, not just with me, but with anyone who has an opinion which differs to your own.
On the plus side many of your posts are funny, but unfortunately, not for reasons that you would find flattering.
here is something to get back to brexit.trolling is when one launches personal attacks on another poster. Instead of arguing the facts, remaining on topic.
Logic unavailing, a more plausible explanation for Brexit fervor may lie in the power of historical myth, as suggested by Irish journalist Fintan O’Toole in his book “Heroic Failure: Brexit and the Politics of Pain.” O’Toole sees the Brexit debacle rooted not in any reality, but in rising English nationalism and a longing for the mythic heroism of World War II and the glories of the lost British Empire. If that sounds preposterous, read the English press.
Rid ourselves of the shackles of the EU, conservatives imagine, and the English — “a sea-faring people” inhabiting “a sceptred isle” — will resume their proud role as unmatched free traders. They’ll revisit their mythical past as swashbuckling buccaneers. Standing up to the EU, invoking another myth, only reflects the Dunkirk spirit. Brexit, in many English minds, has become a contest of wills between Europe and we-will-never-surrender England. Such charged framing plays a disconcertingly prominent role in energizing the Brexit psychodrama.
O’Toole also explores a long-standing obsession of some English conservatives with narratives in which the European project is a disguised attempt by Germany to defeat Britain and dominate Europe, realizing a “Euroreich” — this time without firing a shot. Such notions would seem remote from serious politics, were it not for prominent figures in the U.K. government giving voice to such fantasies. British Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt has compared the EU to both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.
From this perspective, O’Toole notes, the Brexit referendum is a fantasy of national liberation — an historic breaking-free from tyranny and oppression. The trouble, of course, is that the EU — for all its actual imperfections — has never been an oppressive force over the U.K. (Greece has a different experience). Hence, Brexit supporters face an unpalatable choice: lashing themselves to the heroic myth and quite possibly landing the nation in a no-deal Brexit catastrophe, or abandoning the heroic enterprise. But that would mean falling back on boring reality, fantasies deflated.
And what would you have been able to achieve?like coming back with nothing to show for his effort?
Stay on topic please.No, trolling is when one launches personal attacks on another poster. Instead of arguing the facts, remaining on topic. As you do, very often, including in your reply to me, when you run out of valid arguments, as you also do, frequently. Outside a prep school playground, it is very boring.
That may apply to extreme eastender and daytime telly addicts. Perhaps their brexits natural parish. I don't know about other posters, but my relatively sedentary life gives me enough stress not to need brexit. But I can see the logic. After thatcherism, many then late adolescents lost their cause, something to fight against. But there must be more creative ways to spend one's remaining days on the planet than perennially talking about backstops?here is something to get back to brexit.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-03-01/brexit-chaos-appeals-to-human-desire-for-drama
I would treat any negotiation like meeting a customer coming into the shop to test ride some bikes.And what would you have been able to achieve?
The only surprise here is that it is a surprise. I referred some two years ago to the aggravation being experienced by non UK people working in the NHS at the time of the referendum. Many of the younger more mobile professionals,making a decision that when their contracts expired they were going to leave. Of course, they then talk to their friends and they in turn vote with their feet.brexit conundrum: