there was talk of him being gay.Chuka was pretty much nailed on as the next leader on a processional vote but he turned it down for some reason. I think it’s a bit unfair him sniping from the sidelines now.
there was talk of him being gay.Chuka was pretty much nailed on as the next leader on a processional vote but he turned it down for some reason. I think it’s a bit unfair him sniping from the sidelines now.
JC is popular because he is different. He reached millions of people who feel forgotten by successive centre left or centre right governments since John Major. The USA has had Bernie Sanders, France Jean-Luc Mélenchon and UK JC. Only JC made it or is making it because he has absolutely no policy that would cost voters anything. Talking about cakeism.That is why Corbyn is so popular among those who seek a different political agenda and why he was elected leader and has remained so, in spite of the internal backstabbing from those who pretend to be 'centrist' in their views.
Is this meant to be "Saltire" Ooops sorry "Satire"?Among all the material that lands on my desktop, there is the odd gem and this is one - just love the end-piece re. trialling:
View attachment 26729
Tom
And just look at what has happened with petroleum currency in recent decades! That has a destiny of downward decline for a long time yet, the last thing to be tied to long term.Not a chance mate. The dollar is tied up in petroleum currency. You could bring in the Yuan with the Euro and it still wouldn’t come close.
This website may be of some interest. It isn't the most responsive websiteI have used but it creates a picture of some of the parts of the UK to have benefitted from EU assistance and it gives some perspective about how much membership of the EU costs the UK out of the total expenditure of the UK:
https://www.myeu.uk/#/
Tom
Mainly because they didn't understand it rather than disliked it, surelyFinancially we got a decent deal from the EU.
People just didn't like it and voted to leave it.
I think that the EU funds are not managed in the most transparent way, giving the impression that you have to be member of some 'magic circles' to know how to get free EU's money.Mainly because they didn't understand it rather than disliked it, surely
Here you are:I bet you 99% of the population do not know how to get free EU's money.
Other than disagreeing with your choice of the words free money, i would fully agree with your assessment that uk civil servants and more particularly the "gentlemen" they sent to brussels ,were and are singulary ill equipped to engage in the excercise of formulating proposals.I think that the EU funds are not managed in the most transparent way, giving the impression that you have to be member of some 'magic circles' to know how to get free EU's money.
Although the amount distributed in the UK is less than 0.5% of our GDP, it's still a very large number and I bet you 99% of the population do not know how to get free EU's money.
He means £80 billions a year times 15, OG.It's the way he tells them, is there anyone who could possibly be stupid enough not to see that this is utter fantasy?