Brexit, for once some facts.

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
The idiots went ahead this in the Daily Mail
"
Trump launches airstrikes on Damascus in response to 'evil and despicable' chemical attack by 'monster' Assad and directly challenges Putin: 'What kind of a nation wants to be associated with the mass murder of innocent men, women and children?'

Is that a question Donald?
How about the USA and UK?


The reader's comments are almost entirely critical!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon and tillson

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
From the Independent the liar May is at it again
"
British Prime Minister Theresa May said there was “no practicable alternative to the use of force” to stop the use of alleged use of chemical weapons by Bashar al-Assad, as the UK joined the US and France in launching strikes against targets in Syria associated with the use of such substances.

As explosions were being from several locations in Syria, Ms May said she had sought to use every diplomatic channel to avoid the use of force

Marvellous why was there no practicable alternative? the investigation was about to start.

Sought every diplomatic channel?
She never even consulted parliament!

Once again completely at odds with the Reader's comments

And here's a thought to ponder

What happens to the Chemical weapons allegedly stored in places we have just bombed? by what magical stroke do we expect to incinerate them completely preventing any escaping into the atmosphere?
As a means of protecting the public from them this as the Americans would say SUCKS!

If there is any truth in the story that Chemical weapons are indeed stored there, you can imagine the glee of the rebels that we have caused a Chemical weapons attack on the innocent citizens of Damascus.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

tillson

Esteemed Pedelecer
May 29, 2008
5,252
3,197
From the Independent the liar May is at it again
"
British Prime Minister Theresa May said there was “no practicable alternative to the use of force” to stop the use of alleged use of chemical weapons by Bashar al-Assad, as the UK joined the US and France in launching strikes against targets in Syria associated with the use of such substances.

As explosions were being from several locations in Syria, Ms May said she had sought to use every diplomatic channel to avoid the use of force

Marvellous why was there no practicable alternative? the investigation was about to start.

Sought every diplomatic channel?
She never even consulted parliament!

Once again completely at odds with the Reader's comments
Yet again she doesn't listen. I truly believe that she is deluded to the point of a serious mental illness. She is behaving like a child craving adoration.

If any good can come out of her latest episode of craziness, I hope it's something which causes her serious personal harm to the extent of incapacitation. To borrow the words of the hideously deformed cow, "there is no practical alternative."
 
Last edited:

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
Another tweet
True or false? who knows
"#BREAKING ALL OF THE BRITISH MISSILES LOCKED AND SHOT DOWN British missiles that targeted an ammo depot east of #Homs were jammed by Russian Electronic WS and shot down"

"Britain is the only nation other than the United States currently in possession of Tomahawks and last purchased 65 in 2014 for around £98 million.
Total number of Tomahawk missiles launched at #Syria . - 112 - Mostly wasted

If this is trueHow many millions were wasted on this none productive sortie?
All we seem to have done is provided the Russians with some target practice that will be used to improve their defence system.
And what did we get? two things
  1. Wasted a lot of Taxpayers money in a futile gesture
  2. hopefully realised that Cruise missiles are now obsolete
However the official line is this
"a statement from the UK Ministry of Defense said. "They launched Storm Shadow missiles at a military facility -- a former missile base -- some 15 miles west of Homs, where the regime is assessed to keep chemical weapon precursors stockpiled in breach of Syria's obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention."
These are in fact a European Cruise missile
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storm_Shadow

If the enemy can down them, it was an even more expensive night for us as they seem to be nearer to double the cost of a Tomahawk.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
Yet again she doesn't listen. I truly believe that she is deluded to the point of a serious mental illness. She is behaving like a child craving adoration.

If any good can come out of her latest episode of craziness, I hope it's something which causes her serious personal harm to the extent of incapacitating her. To borrow the words of the hideously deformed cow, "there is no practical alternative."
Except for a vote of no confidence in Parliament of course
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
You Gov Poll result

And if reports of our missiles being shot down are true,
the proverbial will really hit the fan!

Cruise missiles were such a convenient way to slaughter the innocent at minimum personal risk to the attacker, without them we can expect unacceptable and very expensive losses in terms of personnel and aircraft shot down in our illegal wars of agression.
And it means that Drones are not so good either!
War becomes less antiseptic and impersonal and we will incur Human losses.

The public will like that even less!
From what information is coming in the raid was not a complete success, with luck the Russians will ignore it.
Significantly there hasn't been claims of widespread targets being taking out by "our" side.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,323
16,849
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
"Britain is the only nation other than the United States currently in possession of Tomahawks and last purchased 65 in 2014 for around £98 million.
Total number of Tomahawk missiles launched at #Syria . - 112 - Mostly wasted

If this is trueHow many millions were wasted on this none productive sortie?
it's better that they are wasted than if they hit some real chemical stores or civilians.
The money was already half wasted anyway.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: oldgroaner

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,323
16,849
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
It's a toss up whether trump has aged better than his tweets.
he tweets his own word but his last speech was probably written by someone else.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon

Danidl

Esteemed Pedelecer
Sep 29, 2016
8,611
12,256
73
Ireland
Too well oganised for us surely?
But one of the terrorist groups would be a likely candidate
From the Sun
"
Now Moscow's defence ministry spokesman Major General Igor Konashenkov has claimed the Kremlin has evidence that Britain has staged the attack.

He said: "We have... evidence that proves Britain was directly involved in organising this provocation."

Konashenkov released statements, supposedly from medics working at Douma’s hospital, who allege a group of people holding video cameras entered the medical facility, shouting that its patients were struck with chemical weapons.

The alleged medics in the report said none of the patients they were treating were hurt by chemicals.

Fascinating that readers make comments which show clearly they either didn't actually bother to read the news article or simply failed utterly to understand it
Here is one
"
Doug McCleur 16 minutes ago

How cr@p are the Russians if they couldn't spot the UK infiltrating the position they are surrounding with the Syrian Army, for us to gas the locals, and then extract, all without being caught. Me thinks they are fibbing

The Russians accused us of instigating the attack by encouraging locals to fake it, and nothing in the paper's report actually gives any other possible impression.
It's worrying that anyone could so misread the written word.
The logic is so cockeyed that the British would travel such distances to do that , .... Why so that they could then spend more money in firing missiles??? .
In these cases, the simple explanation is invariably the correct one. Occam's razor and all that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robdon

Danidl

Esteemed Pedelecer
Sep 29, 2016
8,611
12,256
73
Ireland
You Gov Poll result

And if reports of our missiles being shot down are true,
the proverbial will really hit the fan!

Cruise missiles were such a convenient way to slaughter the innocent at minimum personal risk to the attacker, without them we can expect unacceptable and very expensive losses in terms of personnel and aircraft shot down in our illegal wars of agression.
And it means that Drones are not so good either!
War becomes less antiseptic and impersonal and we will incur Human losses.

The public will like that even less!
From what information is coming in the raid was not a complete success, with luck the Russians will ignore it.
Significantly there hasn't been claims of widespread targets being taking out by "our" side.
Technology gives an edge, but there are always countermeasures, and cruise missiles are no longer novel.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: robdon and flecc

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,323
16,849
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
The logic is so cockeyed that the British would travel such distances to do that , .... Why so that they could then spend more money in firing missiles??? .
The Russians think that the British embed their agents within NGOs and the white helmets. I think there is enough support for their accusations. If they did do the Salisbury's job then why not pin something on them (or their associates) for a change?
Their support on TV comes from a guy who was indeed in the room at Douma General Hospital when the whole thing was filmed.
Mrs TM was also very careful with her words. She did not say 'banned chemical weapons', just 'chemical weapons'. The latter could mean anything from table salt to lemon juice.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: oldgroaner

Zlatan

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 26, 2016
8,086
4,290
The Russians think that the British embed their agents within NGOs and the white helmets. I think there is enough support for their accusations. If they did do the Salisbury's job then why not pin something on them (or their associates) for a change?
Their support on TV comes from a guy who was indeed in the room at Douma General Hospital when the whole thing was filmed.
Mrs TM was also very careful with her words. She did not say 'banned chemical weapons', just 'chemical weapons'. The latter could mean anything from table salt to lemon juice.
Why would we want to
A) Embed agents with " white helmets"?

B) If we did why get them to fabricate chemical attacks ?
 

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,323
16,849
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
B) If we did why get them to fabricate chemical attacks ?
we support the Saudis against 'Iranian expansionists'.
If you wonder why we do that, we sell an awful lot of weapons to the Saudis.
As the Iran supported factions are winning the war in Syria, we try to help the rebels and give the Russians a kick or two at the same time.
 

Zlatan

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 26, 2016
8,086
4,290
we support the Saudis against 'Iranian expansionists'.
If you wonder why we do that, we sell an awful lot of weapons to the Saudis.
As the Iran supported factions are winning the war in Syria, we try to help the rebels and give the Russians a kick or two at the same time.
And the evidence for this supposition ?

I think more likely
"The way the Russian propaganda machine has targeted the White Helmets is a neat case study in the prevailing information wars. It exposes just how rumours, conspiracy theories and half-truths bubble to the top of YouTube, Google and Twitter search algorithms.

“This is the heart of Russian propaganda. In the old days they would try and portray the Soviet Union as a model society. Now it’s about confusing every issue with so many narratives that people can’t recognise the truth when they see it
."

David Patrikarakos, author of War in 140 Characters: How Social Media is Reshaping Conflict in the 21st Century.

We are being manipulated. Its utter rubbish we have agents within " White Helmets".
 
Last edited:

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,323
16,849
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
zlatan, how many people got killed and maimed by the Syrian civil war? and how many got killed and maimed by chemical weapons? and what chemical weapons are they?
Most incidents involving chemical weapons are by chlorine. Under the convention that the Syrian government signed up to, they did not have to destroy chlorine stocks because chlorine is not a banned chemical weapon. When Sarin was used, not enough quantity was used or left trace for UN people to pin that to Mr Assad, so it could be from any of the factions fighting over there. Assad has no special reason to use anything more than choking agents to force his enemies out into fresh air where they can be shot at by his helicopters, chlorine does just that.
 

Advertisers