Then why didn't it work?
Sometimes you surprise me with how little thinking goes on in your head.
Let's see now 8 times more lethal than Sarin you say?
It should then have killed instantly all in contact.
It didn't.
Whacking someone over the head with a baseball bat would have been far cheaper and very likely given the same (or more lethal) result.
You really are easily convinced when things agree with your prejudices and pay no attention at all to the obvious do you
Of course for the best result get Putin to handle it first, to leave DNA traces and accidentally leave it at the source of the crime.
Try reading this link,
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2018/03/theresa-mays-novichok-claims-fall-apart.html
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
It did work and can we have a name for that highlight of literature that basically claims the entire episode is work of May ? Utter rubbish. You will believe anything. Ask Frankie Boyle I bet he knows more than anyone.
Putin won his election and is a hero for standing up to us and rest of countries who have withdrawn / expelled diplomats. Send the link to Macron, Tusk, Trump etc etc etc. They won't have read it either, but for a reason. Its utter BS..
And now you,ve accepted there was a Public Inquiry into Litvinenco murder how come you,d rather believe utter rubbish than an an independent report. Down load the Litvinenco PI and read it all. Then stop posting spurious links from extreme left fanatics.
Your BS report even calls episode an " alledged poisoning"...No , it was a poisoning....definitely. Or has episode not even happened. Like they didn't even land on moon. You really love a conspiracy theory OGski.
Just answer this
If May and her compatriots are so useless how on earth can they organise this entire episode, hoodwink millions of people, including Macron, Tusk and goodness knows who else, keep it all quiet...and then are stupid enough to blame the most powerful man on earth. If this was organised as a distraction you would not poke the bear. I know I,ll blame the school bully..yes sure OGski. You are thicker than even I thought.
You couldn't have read that entire link before posting,nobody in their right mind would do so having read it..oh hang on...you probably did.
Read the Lutvinenco PI. Its rather more objective...and longer.
Changing subject...
Ii suppose all those kicking a fuss up about Labour/ Corbyn are Daily Mail readers and misinformed through propoganda...And Aussies weren,t cheating...well uts not proven is it...
For OGski
Here are the main findings from Sir Robert Owen's long-awaited 300-page report following the public inquiry into the 2006 murder of Litvinenco.
His murder was 'probably' approved by President Vladimir Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, accompanied by Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev in 2015Image copyright Getty Images
"Taking full account of all the evidence and analysis available to me, I find that the FSB operation to kill Litvinenko was probably approved by Mr Patrushev and also by President Putin," Sir Robert wrote.
This is the most significant statement to come out of the report, says the BBC's Richard Galpin.
Nikolai Patrushev was head of Russia's main intelligence agency, FSB, at the time of the murder and very close to Mr Putin.
He was poisoned in the Pine Bar of London's Millennium Hotel
Taxi outside Millennium HotelImage copyright AP
Mr Litvinenko died from acute radiation syndrome on 23 November 2006, three weeks after drinking tea containing polonium-210 in the hotel bar in central London.
He was deliberately poisoned by Andrei Lugovoi and Dmitry Kovtun
Andrei Lugovoi, left, and Dmitry KovtunImage copyright EPA
For many years, they have been the two chief suspects. Mr Lugovoi had been in the FSB and the federal protection service, and continued to have strong links to the FSB.
The Russian pair had tried to poison Mr Litvinenko almost a month earlier at a London office of multinational security company, Erinys, the report said.
They knew they were using a deadly poison, but did not know precisely which chemical, it went on.
Both deny killing Mr Litvinenko. They are wanted in the UK for questioning, but Russia has refused to extradite them.
The poisoning probably took place under the direction of the FSB
Sir Robert said there was a strong probability that Mr Lugovoi poisoned Mr Litvinenko under the direction of Moscow's FSB intelligence service.
Mr Kovtun was also acting under FSB direction, possibly indirectly through Mr Lugovoi but probably to his knowledge.
The use of polonium-210 was "at the very least a strong indicator of state involvement".
Motives included Mr Litvinenko's work and criticism of Russia
Alexander Litvinenko, author of the book "Blowing Up Russia: Terror From Within"Image copyright AP
Possible motives were Mr Litvinenko's work for British intelligence agencies, his criticism of Mr Putin and the FSB and his association with other Russian dissidents, the report said.
There was "undoubtedly a personal dimension to the antagonism" between Mr Putin and Mr Litvinenko, Sir Robert said.
"I am satisfied that in general terms, members of the Putin administration, including the president himself and the FSB, had motives for taking action against Litvinenko, including killing him, in late 2006."
The inquiry heard evidence that Mr Litvinenko may have been consigned to a slow death from radiation to "send a message"
There are similarities between this case and the Salisbury poisoning.( sorry alledged)
Seems many would rather believe rubbish posted by fanatics.
And just announced.NATO getting it wrong aswell.?
"The Nato secretary general, Jens Stoltenberg, said the permanent size of the Russian mission would be cut from 30 to 20 people, adding the announcement was “a clear and very strong message that that there was a cost to Russia’s reckless actions” in poisoning the Russian double agent Sergei Skripal in Salisbury earlier this month."
Why on earth didn't they consult OG and Flecc first.
