Here is a reminder of what Jeremy Corbyn is about incorporating a frank comparison with the warmongering tories and pink tories who have repeatedly dragged this country into conflict, usually based on LIES!
Tom
Tom
I do see your point Flecc but exactly who are these unknown perpatrators ; what do they stand to benefit and how clever and capable would they have to be to pull wool over us, all of EU, Russia and,America. They know who has done it Flecc.Or maybe you are doing exactly what the real perpetrators want you to do? Assume the obvious.
Given the dominance of the uncertainties I prefer to not accuse anyone, but instead defend anyone accused on the basis of unsupported accusations. Defending on that basis is not saying they are innocent, it just acknowledges the inadequacy of the evidence and the scale of other possibilities.
.
That's the point, they don't have to be clever and capable since they know how predisposed the West is to accuse Russia of everything and anything, especially since Crimea.who are these unknown perpatrators ; what do they stand to benefit and how clever and capable would they have to be to pull wool over us,
They,d have to be extremely clever to get hold of the poison, deliver it ( probably in Russia or probably through security in UK) ,place poison in right place and then get clean away with nobody knowing anything about it.That's the point, they don't have to be clever and capable since they know how predisposed the West is to accuse Russia of everything and anything, especially since Crimea.
As current events show only too clearly, any hint is enough to trigger the accusations.
As for who could be the perpetrators, the list of those who despise Russia and Putin and would want to discredit them is very long, and many of them have the capabilities, knowledge and opportunities.
.
Exactly.Perhaps all circumstantial but that's all we,ll ever get.
And doesn't work both ways? If one has apologists prepared to argue that every deception has an innocent meaning, does that not give licence?. The advantage of the double bluff.That's the point, they don't have to be clever and capable since they know how predisposed the West is to accuse Russia of everything and anything, especially since Crimea.
As current events show only too clearly, any hint is enough to trigger the accusations.
As for who could be the perpetrators, the list of those who despise Russia and Putin and would want to discredit them is very long, and many of them have the capabilities, knowledge and opportunities.
.
That's the impossibility and why the certainties implied by the current official accusations are so wrong. They make the accusers look foolish in many eyes. It's left the Russians secretly amused, not a good outcome if they are the guilty ones.And doesn't work both ways? If one has apologists prepared to argue that every deception has an innocent meaning, does that not give licence?. The advantage of the double bluff.
I don't even understand what you mean?Lets throw another clue into the mix...
“Traitors will kick the bucket, believe me. Those other folks betrayed their friends, their brother in arms,” Mr Putin said.
“Whatever they got in exchange for it, those 30 pieces of silver they were given, they will choke on them.”
C`mon Flecc lets see you brush this one aside with your flowery command of the english vocabulary? !
By that token Flecc May, Macron,, nearly all Tory party, half labour party,Trump, France, Germany and security services of USA, UK,France,Germany etc etc are all wrong ???That's the impossibility and why the certainties implied by the current official accusations are so wrong. They make the accusers look foolish in many eyes. It's left the Russians secretly amused, not a good outcome if they are the guilty ones.
This could have been handled far more subtly.
.
It was a series of comments ( some televised) made by Putin talking about double agents,agitators and politic opponents. He came over quite a thug.I don't even understand what you mean?
.
I can post the video if that`s of any help??I don't even understand what you mean?
.
No, I don't know what I'm suppose to explain away, your post makes no sense. Who was being spoken of and in what context? Perhaps you'd care to explain that?Or do you mean you can`t explain that away?
The DUP, political wing of the protestant extremist groups in NI, took not 30 pieces of silver but £1billion from the British taxpayers' purse to provide succour to the tory scum in order to keep that despicable party in power.“Whatever they got in exchange for it, those 30 pieces of silver they were given, they will choke on them.”
What on earth has Tommie's quote about Putin's comments got to do with this ? Think you,ve been on the pop.The DUP, political wing of the protestant extremist groups in NI, took not 30 pieces of silver but £1billion from the British taxpayers' purse to provide succour to the tory scum in order to keep that despicable party in power.
Be careful what you wish for!
Tom
You won't have. All very thick skinned on here.( especially us trolls)suppose when you can`t answer the question.... change the subject!
sorry if i upset your sensitivities chaps
It was a series of comments ( some televised) made by Putin talking about double agents,agitators and politic opponents. He came over quite a thug.
Thanks for the explanation Zlatan.I can post the video if that`s of any help??