Your approach is back to front, and in a commercial setting potentially unlawful.
Known risks must be sufficiently mitigated, and most of that is in designing out the chances of them occurring.
Instead of containing a risky procedure in a fire proof box, eliminate the risky procedure!
That might be to implement equipment that cannot produce the dangerous situation. In the example of charging an individual cell group, the charging equipment would need to incorporate as a minimum automatic disconnection to avoid exceeding safe voltage, and better if it also monitored temperature and current.
Or in a commercial setting, treat a severely depleted or unbalanced battery as dangerous scrap, and eliminate the procedure altogether. Where's the liability if such a 'recovered' battery goes on to cause a problem? I wouldn't want it.
A fireproof box as a secondary measure does no harm, but is no substitute for proper risk controls.