I'm thinking of setting up a Great British company called ... Clutching at Straws Ltd
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry cant agree a lot company car drivers have a choice of car and in my experience if they have a choice the one thing they dont choose is a Ford (and definitely not a Mondeo). Most people I have ever known who have a new Ford (privately or company) have it because they think they are buying British. Try it on the High Street list a load of car manufacturers and ask which ones the public think are British I bet more than 50% will include Ford.They don't, a very large proportion of Ford's sales are to fleets of rental and company cars, it's those other makes and many more which pick up much of the individual retail market. As someone who spent years in the motor industry I know only too well that private buyers don't like others to think they are driving a company car when they've paid privately for it, so they buy makes not associated in that way. Vauxhall also suffer severely from this effect on their mainstream car models.
The cost facts are not mumbo jumbo. As I've observed, the added cost cannot be reflected in added hardware value, so any consumer judgement will be on subjective values. That can mean as many value judgments as there are consumers.I would also be interested to see how the two bikes match up performance wise and see if the wisper 905se is worth its extra £820, from purely a consumer point of view without all the mumbo jumbo.
Yep there is no way a Bugatti Veron is 50 times a better car than a Ford MondeoThe cost facts are not mumbo jumbo. As I've observed, the added cost cannot be reflected in added hardware value, so any consumer judgement will be on subjective values. That can mean as many value judgments as there are consumers.
The rule is always the same, as price increases, the actual value does not increase pro-rata, it's unavoidable.
Believe what you will, I know the facts. First, the largest fleets are the rental ones and renters get what each rental company offers. Second, the majority of private buyers do not put the perception of the car maker's national identity before avoidance of fleet car identity. The national identity market is a relatively small one and most consumers are not as stupid as you seem to think.Sorry cant agree
I'd already said, when someone spends a lot of money buying a new car, they don't want others to think they are driving a company car. I suppose it's mainly a status thing, but the fact is that both Ford and Vauxhall have always suffered in the personal market for mid range models in consequence of their bulk fleet sales. In the economy boom years their policy pays off, but in the recessionary times as now, they really suffer. Surely you've been aware of their cutback announcements of the last three years, a period in which many other makes have done rather well as the private market has been returning to some health. Nissan, Citroen, Kia and Hyundai have been doing particularly well in comparison.Why exactly would anyone not want a car because it was a fleet model....I dont understand....
What if someone chose to buy it becase they like the look of the Union Jack on the frame, whether or not the bike is actually British?May I pick the Forums brains?
Would anyone here be more inclined to buy a bike because it is sporting the Union Flag? Irrespective of where it is built. Or would it make you less likely to buy? We know all the arguments for and against the use so let's not go there again. It would simply be useful and interesting to know would you be more likely to buy any bike because it had a Union Flag in it's logo?
All the best
David
I've never understood this Ignore List business. People have threatened me with it in the past. It's a bit like a peeping-tom or a stalker sending you a message to say that they won't be coming round after dark to observe you.kudos Dave you have just been added to my "ignore" list
I've never understood this Ignore List business. People have threatened me with it in the past. It's a bit like a peeping-tom or a stalker sending you a message to say that they won't be coming round after dark to observe you.
One or two on here are a little bit too eager to tell others what to post and on what topic.
If Kudos, Woosh, Wisper and some other members want to talk about Wisper's use of the Union Jack, it isn't up to any of us to tell them not to.
The topic interests me, so I've posted a couple of times.
If it didn't interest me, I would look elsewhere for my entertainment.
What I would not do is post to tell others what they should or should not be talking about.
Its sometimes cynically said that no law is well written since all have unintended consequences.Lets hope we have seen the last of Union Jack flags on any product which is not made in the UK,I was surprised how succinct the law was on this matter-it specifically mentioned product,display,advertising literature-I have often found reading law to be so full of exceptions that it is difficult to be precise but this law was clearly written.
Just more dishonesty - but at least the second one says 'designed in GB'. However, just because your neighbour burgles houses, doesn't mean you have to, eh?