Prices of the electricity we use to charge

saneagle

Esteemed Pedelecer
Oct 10, 2010
6,798
3,135
Telford
Last year only 30% of the total electric power generated in the uk used fossil fuel technology. Wind, solar, nuclear and wood pellets generated the rest - about 70%.

The uk for most of the year is not an ideal solar powerhouse, but southern Europe and North Africa could become the new Saudi Arabia if they could sort out the political issues which hold them back. Very high voltage DC transmission could be delivering vast amounts of electric power across the Med with only 10% losses.

It is surprising that more has not been done to utilise the vast amount of sunlight that just heats up sand in N Africa.
Good point. If you think about it logically, the climate has been in equilibrium for millions of years. Energy comes from the sun, does something to the planet, then radiates out into space. When you harness wind, tidal or solar energy, the equilibrium remains the same; however, if you burn stuff, like wood, coal or oil, or you make heat with nuclear ot chemicals (bombs and fireworks), you add heat into the system, which, in theory, should disrupt the equilibrium. Nuclear energy might be clean, but it's not going to solve global warming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghost1951

lenny

Esteemed Pedelecer
May 3, 2023
2,584
767

saneagle

Esteemed Pedelecer
Oct 10, 2010
6,798
3,135
Telford
Don't worry, they'll be back soon. The sun is now starting to move away from the Earth after getting closer for hundreds of years, but watch out because every time that's happened before, it triggered a major catastrophic volcanic event within 40 years.
 

lenny

Esteemed Pedelecer
May 3, 2023
2,584
767
Sadly I'm inclined to agree on the timescale for our return to full. membership, perhaps a return to the good old "Common Market" could be a more immediate prospect?
In the meantime the Brexit voters in Clacton are out celebrating

 
  • Like
Reactions: Woosh

Ghost1951

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jun 2, 2024
1,562
610
Good point. If you think about it logically, the climate has been in equilibrium for millions of years. Energy comes from the sun, does something to the planet, then radiates out into space. When you harness wind, tidal or solar energy, the equilibrium remains the same; however, if you burn stuff, like wood, coal or oil, or you make heat with nuclear ot chemicals (bombs and fireworks), you add heat into the system, which, in theory, should disrupt the equilibrium. Nuclear energy might be clean, but it's not going to solve global warming.
Don't worry, they'll be back soon. The sun is now starting to move away from the Earth after getting closer for hundreds of years, but watch out because every time that's happened before, it triggered a major catastrophic volcanic event within 40 years.
You might like this video by one of the best science communicators on the web. Love this guy's work. Well worth a watch.

 
  • :D
Reactions: POLLY

Ghost1951

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jun 2, 2024
1,562
610

Is Lenny likening Farage to Hitler? I hope not.

One fascinating thing about this election is the way that votes won overall bear no relation to seats and power to make change.

Sin Fein 210 thousand votes 7 seats
SNP 708 thousand votes 9 seats
Lib Dems 3 million votes 71 seats.
Reform 4.1 million votes. 5 seats.
Conservatives 6.8 million votes 121 seats
Labour 9.6 million votes 412 seats

Labour with only a bit more than twice the votes Reform got, have nearly ten times as many seats.
 
Last edited:

Ghost1951

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jun 2, 2024
1,562
610
Good point. If you think about it logically, the climate has been in equilibrium for millions of years. Energy comes from the sun, does something to the planet, then radiates out into space. When you harness wind, tidal or solar energy, the equilibrium remains the same; however, if you burn stuff, like wood, coal or oil, or you make heat with nuclear ot chemicals (bombs and fireworks), you add heat into the system, which, in theory, should disrupt the equilibrium. Nuclear energy might be clean, but it's not going to solve global warming.
The problem with fossil fuels is that the planet locked away that carbon millions of years ago, stabilising the carbon in the atmosphere. This wasn't done for our benefit of course, we just happen to actually benefit from a benign climate on much of the planet, which was created by the fact that natural processes, over very long time scales locked up that carbon.

Depending on how much of that carbon we burn, and put back into the atmosphere, we will change that balance and warm the planet up.

It won't be the end of life of course, but it may end our civilisations. In periods in the past the planet was far warmer because of vast eruptions of co2 from volcanic activity. There were animals and plenty of them.

They just happened to be very different animals and not at all like us.
 
  • :D
Reactions: POLLY

Ghost1951

Esteemed Pedelecer
Jun 2, 2024
1,562
610
This is a great move by Starmer. I am very pleased to see this.


FAR too often, ministers with no clue are appointed to roles they then fail to function in. They have no skills to deal with the tasks in hand. James Timpson has invested heavily for many years in giving jobs to released prisoners and for most of those released prisoners they function well inside his key cutting and shoe repairing business. Timpson will be a winner in this job I think.

MINISTERS SHOULD BE PEOPLE WHO KNOW HOW TO DO THINGS

They usually don't know anything useful and this is why we are in such a mess in a country where nothing works.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: flecc

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,350
16,865
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
FAR too often, ministers with no clue are appointed to roles they then fail to function in.
that is usually seen in conservative administrations.

They usually don't know anything useful and this is why we are in such a mess in a country where nothing works.
there are numerous studies as to why we are stuck in a hole since the sub prime mortage crisis in 2008. Low productivity leads to lower growth compared to the US, the EU, Australia, the BRICS etc. We used to enjoy better living standard than the Americans. Not now. We are about 40% behind the average American.
Of the £3 trillions worth of assets that the LSE manages, little is invested outside London.
Most of our savings go into stoking up house price instead of investing in productive industries. It's the legacy of MT.
 

soundwave

Esteemed Pedelecer
May 23, 2015
16,876
6,494
one guy ran over his big toe with a wheel chair and that fell off in hospital think it just went in the bin after everyone had a look at it. :oops:


and someone threw one of my shoes in the bin when i went for a ct scan place is a fkn joke no one gives a crap anymore.