as you can see, remain would win if there were a referendum tomorrow but the UK is still very much split roughly in the middle.
Brexit, for once some facts.
- Thread starter flecc
- Start date
You might be right but the turnout would be much lower making the result a farce.
It's you picking the bits you like, aren't you ?this time Yorkshire voted to remainTalk about picking the bits that suit your argument..
Results for York in 2016
Remain 63,617
Leave 45,983
So the exact opposite of what you are thinking, Yes Yorkshire voted 70% to
leave but York voted to remain by a massive margin.
EU Referendum results | EU Referendum results | City of York Council
Results from the referendum on whether the United Kingdom (UK) should remain in the European Union (EU) held on 23 June 2016.www.york.gov.uk
You might be right about the turnout being lower, but I think it would be the Leave voters who would abandon the polls.
I was going to say the next few months of politics will be fascinating, but when you think about it, it won’t. The idle, useless, **ckers in parliament will be on annual leave whilst this crisis plays out. Unbelievable.
Good morning, Read your original post again. It reads like York has changed it's position from leave to Remain and it hasn't, it has always been Remain.
What this will do is simply make matters worse with both parties having internal battles.
From their point of view, it makes good sense to delay matters and crash out with no deal, and avoid carrying the can when things go wrong.
Blame free brexit! Ideal for both party leaders, you can always blame the EU or the public.
From their point of view, it makes good sense to delay matters and crash out with no deal, and avoid carrying the can when things go wrong.
Blame free brexit! Ideal for both party leaders, you can always blame the EU or the public.
I agree it would be the leave voters that would abandon the polls. Hopefully all of them. Remain would then win by 100%.....The leave parties have already said boycotting another referendum would be a possibility.
But not the rest of Yorkshire, that was my point
Neither won. Claiming it was a second referendum is utter BS.
Ukip voters transferred to BXP, Labour and Tory to Lib Dems in a pointless meaningless waste of money.
The result shows us nothing, apart from silly people trying to claim none existent success stories.
Now that we have massive social media and celebrity exposure, It makes you wonder, if some one famous and popular started a "what's the point of voting party" how they would fare.
Oh dear, Tony Robinson has lost his deposit. Never mind. 
Watching Daniel Hannan this morning on TV reminds me that he is no longer an MEP.
there is some good in the EP election I think.
Maybe a "non of the above"party would be a better name LOL
How can you make an excuse that your own candidate, selected by your own selection procedures, caused your reputation to be marred? If you don't want to get tarred make sure you keep good a distance from the brush.
Fanning said she felt the party would be lucky to get three seats in total. “I believe that’s because Ukip’s EU campaign has been overshadowed by Sargon of Akkad’s disgusting comments and rape jokes and things he has said in the past. That’s very much marred Ukip’s reputation.”
Fanning said she felt the party would be lucky to get three seats in total. “I believe that’s because Ukip’s EU campaign has been overshadowed by Sargon of Akkad’s disgusting comments and rape jokes and things he has said in the past. That’s very much marred Ukip’s reputation.”
Whatever.
"All any of them do is rip off the British pubic" is what you said - which is the sort of thing nut-jobs and freaks think.
No - it is NOT ALL THAT THEY DO and to say such a thing only makes you look ridiculous.
Interesting election results though huh?
This is like the old Monty Python joke, remember?
I'll avoid repeating it but use the lines just the same.
"You have insulted the good name of the UKIP"
"Don't be ridiculous, the UKIP hasn't got a good name!"
