The term 'hard' Brexit still makes me laugh. Sorry. Look - we either leave the single market, the customs union, get out from under the ECJ and get rid of free movement - or we don't. Its black and white.
Brexit, for once some facts.
- Thread starter flecc
- Start date
We should offer to all appear on Question time, it would be more fun for the viewers than watching the house of commons
You clearly don't know what socialism is when you say Corbyn is nearer Marxism and Communism, but say Blair had labour policies. You clearly like Centrism and have said so, but hate real socialism.
Blair didn't have labour policies, remember he created the academies, an arch Tory policy if ever there was one.
There are some things that should never be privatised, and national railways, water and education are chief among them. Corbyn wants the first two renationalised, while Blair's academies privatised education. There's no doubt who is the socialist and true Labour party member according to the tenets of the party created by Keir Hardy.
.
It’s a fact. Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party have more staff on the ground than we do.
They’ve recruited over 70 full-time campaigners – to help them win the local elections in May.
And with a majority of their campaigners based outside London, it’s clear what Labour are doing. They’re targeting our most important seats.
If Labour win in May, we know what will happen. Higher council tax, weaker public services and a path for Jeremy Corbyn to become Prime Minister.
We’ve only got 90 days left to the local elections. So will you make a contribution to OUR campaign managers?
In last year’s local elections, we beat Labour because of our campaign managers.
And we can beat them again. With your support, we’ll show that we’re able to take on Corbyn at the letter box as well as the dispatch box.
I know that campaign managers work.
They helped us beat Ed Miliband in 2015. They helped us win last year’s local elections. And they help our party stay in power.
So thanks to our campaign managers, 1.9 million more children are in good or outstanding schools. Unemployment is at its lowest level since the 1970s. Income tax has been cut for 32 million people. And our NHS is set to receive a record level of funding.
And we can only afford our campaign managers because people like you are present AND involved.
50Hertz, if you sign up to be a Gold member in the next 24 hours, I’ll send you a signed copy of my latest dispatch box statement (click here to see the video).
Michael Gove MP
Now should I sign up and win a chance of receiving a free copy of Michael Gove's Despatch Box Statement.
I've replied to the like of this before, there is no shortfall.
At every stage of the EU's growth they've drawn money from members according to their financial position and used it to budget their wealth redistribution.
Wealth redistribution doesn't have a fixed cost like a product, it's just what income is received, just like a charity's receipts. Therefore there never is a shortfall since there's no figure to fall short of.
There'll just be a bit less to redistribute to fewer members. Not as much less as you might think, since there will no longer be any EU aid for the UK's many poor regions.
.
Last edited:
More lies in the press - Tim putting them right:
Not One In Three Businesses Planning Brexit Relocation But One In Six Hundred
The Institute of Directors says that one in three of its members is thinking about, planning for, business relocation in the event of Brexit. This is being reported as one in three businesses is planning for relocation in the event of Brexit. The two are not the same statement although that’s how our entirely unbiased media is reporting it:
Do note that the IoD is not representative in any manner, statistical or otherwise, of British business.
Or, you know, close enough, one in six hundred businesses is planning a post-Brexit relocation. Yes, of course, mere pendantry, two orders of magnitude and a doubling, what’s that between friends?
Thank goodness the British media is entirely free of fake news, eh?
Not One In Three Businesses Planning Brexit Relocation But One In Six Hundred
The Institute of Directors says that one in three of its members is thinking about, planning for, business relocation in the event of Brexit. This is being reported as one in three businesses is planning for relocation in the event of Brexit. The two are not the same statement although that’s how our entirely unbiased media is reporting it:
One in three UK firms plan for no-deal Brexit relocation, IoD says
No, it doesn’t. It says that one third of IoD members are.Nearly one in three British businesses are planning to relocate some of their operations abroad or have already shifted them to cope with a hard Brexit, according to a leading lobby group. The Institute of Directors (IoD) warned that 29% of firms in a survey of 1,200 members believed Brexit posed a significant risk to their operations in the UK and had either moved part of their businesses abroad already or were planning to do so.
There are 5.5 to 6 million businesses in the UK. The IoD has 30,000 members. The finding is that one in three of IoD members are planning for relocation of some part of their activities. That is, 0.166% of businesses are planning relocation – that’s what has actually been found.Do note that the IoD is not representative in any manner, statistical or otherwise, of British business.
Or, you know, close enough, one in six hundred businesses is planning a post-Brexit relocation. Yes, of course, mere pendantry, two orders of magnitude and a doubling, what’s that between friends?
Thank goodness the British media is entirely free of fake news, eh?
No I have sad little fingers who does all my thinking. He isn't very good as you might have noticed.
I haven't called anyone a twat yet, twatty mactwatface did though (he also posts under fingers I think he is really Donald Trump, such tiny little fingers...)
Agreed, the IoD claim was just propaganda, designed to distort.
However, it's not about numbers since many would have little or no effect if they moved. It's the importance of those who do move that counts, and losing the UK based motor industry, if it happened, would be a very serious loss.
Like you though, I think a deal will be cobbled together somehow, so that wouldn't be in prospect.
.
It is little wonder that my British colleagues,and fellow posters are confused. The attached is a Twitter post from one of your elected MEPs. .. now these are people you have elected to represent your interests in the EU parliament... Not unelected . These are the people you entrust with your welfare. You cannot disown them.
https://www.joe.ie/amp/news/ukip-leader-mep-makes-astonishingly-false-claim-irish-border-656718.
The factual position is that there are some 3500 HGVs per day,and 14 million crossings per annum of all vehicles
https://www.joe.ie/amp/news/ukip-leader-mep-makes-astonishingly-false-claim-irish-border-656718.
The factual position is that there are some 3500 HGVs per day,and 14 million crossings per annum of all vehicles
May will get her deal through, so no deal won't be a problem.
Thats one of your better posts,you do have another kiwi trait.
If he does your thinking for you and he is bad, how bad are you at it? Self effacing is an admirable trait. Goodonyer.
Last edited:
Brexit: Leave.EU and Arron Banks' firm fined £120,000 over data breaches
Now that has to be the bargain of the century for Putin, damage done both the EU and the UK for such a piffling sum!
Did you ever expect anything other than a whitewash when the result is so convenient to the Conservative Party.
Yup.
And I saw this:
In 2018, an EEF survey stated that only 7% of the companies surveyed are planning to move production to the EU but, on the other hand, a much greater proportion (12%) are planning to move production back to the UK. Again, this went unreported.
And what a bargain it was too!
If only we had politicians who were not simply rogues , but capable too!
Six hundred and odd of them outsmarted by an EX KGB thug pulling the strings on his "useful idiots"
Last edited: