As someone who lives in N.I. what is the reasoning behind this 1970`s thing??who wants most of the country to return to the 1890s is happy it seems for Northern Ireland to only return to the 1970s.
As someone who lives in N.I. what is the reasoning behind this 1970`s thing??who wants most of the country to return to the 1890s is happy it seems for Northern Ireland to only return to the 1970s.
I suggest you ask JRM.As someone who lives in N.I. what is the reasoning behind this 1970`s thing??
I suggest you ask JRM.
Tom
Jacob Rees-Mogg suggested that people at the Northern Ireland border crossing could be ‘inspected’ after Brexit just like it was done ‘during the troubles’.Err... JRM??
he never mentioned it.
anyone else care to explain??
When you reach maturity you will come to understand these things better but as you seem unable to demonstrate sufficient competence or motivation to read the Peter Stefanovic remarks or check out the video clip of JRM actually describing how a return to the border policing of 'the troubles' would satisfy all that is required of border control, I suggest you try harder.Err... JRM??
he never mentioned it.
anyone else care to explain??
Dreadful, just as bad as African parliaments being full of black MPs.
Which moratorium only applies within the 12 mile limit.Whether or not the British vessels were on the high seas or inside French territorial waters seems somewhat irrelevant if, as 'Woosh' has mentioned, there is a moratorium on fishing for scallops during part of the year.
Yes, but being aware of rules which apply within another country does not mean that you have to comply with those rules when you are not in the jurisdiction of that country. I don't disagree that the French fishermen have a grievance but they have resorted to violence over British actions they don't like rather than British actions which are illegal.If that is the case thus providing the trigger for the French fishermen's anger and potentially fatal violence, then our fishing would be in breach of rules known to our boat skippers, rendering it illegal but instead of 'morally questionable', I would call it morally reprehensible.
I'm sorry I wasn't very clear with my mention of the "largest member of the Union". The Union I referred to isn't the EU but closer to home. Going by the referendum results, N. Ireland and Scotland are happy to be in the EU club so only some of the British are not team players.As for your disagreement with my assertion that the British are poor team players,
You must have missed this bit of report Flecc.Dreadful, just as bad as African parliaments being full of black MPs.
.
Care to explain why "Brexit is likely to make it worse" is the case?
Don't worry about it folks , by the time the Express, Telegraph and Daily Mail have finished whatever change no matter how dire happens will inevitably be one of three thingsView attachment 26560
TELL YOUR LEAVER FRIENDS | This is their new mad world of Brexit fun facts of the day.
1. We are planning a trade deal with six sub-Saharan countries which is exactly the same as the current EU deal we have with them - but; we will sell less due to ‘rules of origin’ restrictions and, wait for it... have to accept African immigration we don’t have now and give even more foreign aid to invest for the privilege.
2. We are also planning to trade deal with Turkey - which we already have a deal with through the EU - and will have to accept the very same increased Turkey immigration that the Leave campaigns said we would have if we remained in the EU (but if we did, we don’t have to accept).
3. We are planning a trade deal with Brunei, the only SE Asian country with Sharia Law in their constitution. Maybe more immigration here, too? It is a staple of any trade deal now.
How’s the new world of Brexit Global Britain going, Leavers?
Tom
I was only teasing, I agree that the lack of minority representation In such as the EU Commission and Parliament is very wrong. As far as the parliament is concerned though, minority candidates have to stand to be elected, so either they are not standing or selection discrimination in member nations is causing the problem.You must have missed this bit of report Flecc.
View attachment 26557
What happens in Africa is irrelevant, besides I suspect whites have had their share of control. Is there a white community unrepresented?
The EU doesn't actually practice what it preaches both in this instance and many others.
http://www.neenagillmep.eu/ethnic_minorities_are_under_represented_in_the_european_parliament
UK has 8% Ethnic minority MPs. How many does EU have.. Its in the link above.To save anybody calculating it its around 1.5%...And yet they claim EU is a democracy.
And BTW half of that 1.5% are from UK !! Post Brexit EU will have under 1% Ethnic Minority MEPs.
Just remind me which way racists voted.
The EU is intrinsically racist.
Just think on this for a moment. After we leave there will be 2 black MEPs. From a total of 750.
Because relatively we supply more ethnic minority MEPs. (the link explains it OG) And yes, although things are far from perfect racially in UK we are much more integrated than EU parliament. I said months ago and suggest it from personal experience. If you think UK is racist you had better stay here. Only place my race(actually skin colour) has been an issue is France.Care to explain why "Brexit is likely to make it worse" is the case?
Are you making a point that this country is somehow more virtuous than other EU nations?
Yes, I know from when I lived in France just how bad the racism can be there, especially for anyone black. My uncle used to supply basic food items from his delicatessan to some black households, but did it after dark out of fear that his white customers would see and stop their custom. I knew this because I did some of those delivery runs with him, using his unmarked Peugeot 403.If you think UK is racist you had better stay here. Only place my race has been an issue is France.
I agree re your last point. The link suggests same. But it becomes an EU problem when vast swathes of population appear or are under represented. The EU could easily impose quotas in a similar way to voting powers amongst members. How can EU possibly argue, suggest or think black people are represented at Parliament with only 3 (soon 2) Black folk in Parliament. I, d suggest EU lags behind all other western Democracies with regard to ethnic minority representation.I was only teasing, I agree that the lack of minority representation In such as the EU Commission and Parliament is very wrong. As far as the parliament is concerned though, minority candidates have to stand to be elected, so either they are not standing or selection discrimination in member nations is causing the problem.
Equally the Commission members are appointed by member nations, so in both cases it's not an EU problem but a member nation one.
.