That's legitimate provided they have different spins.quantum cabinet?
That's legitimate provided they have different spins.quantum cabinet?
Not if you are trying to get something done!That's legitimate provided they have different spins.
I would welcome a new referendum,
Cancel it of course, have you a problem with that? clearly there is no clear mandate as Nigel Farage saidright, lets fast-forward to the new referendum..
Result is..
Remain 52% Leave 48%
What now? Best of 3 or what?
and will we have to endure another long-winded whingefest here on Pedelecs??
It would already be the best of 3:right, lets fast-forward to the new referendum..
Result is..
Remain 52% Leave 48%
What now? Best of 3 or what?
and will we have to endure another long-winded whingefest here on Pedelecs??
proper schrodinger cat, we cannot know whether it is dead or notquantum cabinet?
It's more of a Norwegian Blueproper schrodinger cat, we cannot know whether it is dead or not
A good question. My suggestion would beright, lets fast-forward to the new referendum..
Result is..
Remain 52% Leave 48%
What now? Best of 3 or what?
and will we have to endure another long-winded whingefest here on Pedelecs??
Or you can use the latest EU preferred method of drawing straws as they did in solving the Agency impasse vote.A good question. My suggestion would be
1. Set a threshold which is unambiguous 50% of voters +1 is not a good threshold. I could imagine a 60% margin from the status quo ante as a reasonable margin for change
2.Allow all interested uk subjects have a vote... That would include those no longer living on the mainland , but include all British passport holders.
3. Provide all documentation now available ... Including those reports currently suppressed by the British cabinet and any of the papers. Since the uk government would be entering a new set of negotiations, their publication would not compromise anything. They should also have available any of the EU documents tabled to date. An electroral commission, independent of any side should provide authorative interpretations.
4. There should be a specific minimum turnout in order for the poll to be valid.
Under those conditions, nobody could whinge if the British public want to commit hari kiri.
In any event the last poll always counts, everything previous is old news. Old stuff doesn't count.
Better than being blackmailed as happens here, though you are actually accurately describing the motivation behind large numbers of Brexit Voters during the referendum, who had no clue as to the consequences of their vote, or the facts of the situation. And lets face it, want to know even less now as it makes them look silly.Or you can use the latest EU preferred method of drawing straws as they did in solving the Agency impasse vote.
So please tell us how do you solve a 50/50 tie in a vote after several rounds? Pick the stupidest solution and stamp "will of the people" on the result?Or you can use the latest EU preferred method of drawing straws as they did in solving the Agency impasse vote.
As the Conservative Government did?So please tell us how do you solve a 50/50 tie in a vote after several rounds? Pick the stupidest solution and stamp "will of the people" on the result?
a soft brexit.So please tell us how do you solve a 50/50 tie in a vote after several rounds? Pick the stupidest solution and stamp "will of the people" on the result?
Just a suggestion - refer it to the EU parliament for a vote i.e.a democratic decision as the reduced Council was unable to make it.So please tell us how do you solve a 50/50 tie in a vote after several rounds? Pick the stupidest solution and stamp "will of the people" on the result?
Revolutionary idea! do expand on that...Just a suggestion - refer it to the EU parliament for a vote i.e.a democratic decision as the reduced Council was unable to make it.