<sound of throwing up> when will the banana myth ever die? Bojo should get jail time for that lie.
And they did this on a regular basis for over 40 yearsThere are no rules on bananas, anly a set of standards that enable buying at a distance with confidence. They enable one to know the quality etc of what one will receive. Such agreed standards are important in an open market. But anyone is free to buy at any quality standard, it's a free choice with no rule preventing even the lowest grade product if that is what is desired.
It was the likes of the Daily Mail seizing upon these standards and falsely portraying them as rules which led to so many believing otherwise.
.
Which is a fundamental problem in our democracy, decisions based upon ignorance.Their votes are worth same as yours.
Yes, the Greeks knew very well this fact since Plato's days.Which is a fundamental problem in our democracy, decisions based upon ignorance.
.
Absolutely true!I enjoyed your analogy...
But back to your main point
Will this mythical MP demand this before or after brexit is triggered? .... Why has nobody picked up on the fact that the Westminster parliment loses control of this option post the letter being sent to EU.
UK will then be relying on the comfort of strangers ! Strangers which they have sent a while insulting.....
Massive generalisation... coming up.
New data out today shows, the brilliant news.
We're being taken out of the EU by a load of old, uneducated people.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38762034
obviously this isn't new news, but the details are new and do back up many things, that had been expected.
Some interesting data, on the local level.
If I was an MP, I know what this would make me feel.
Ignorance extending right into parliament itself, hence the setting up of select committees, a step away from democracy.Yes, the Greeks knew very well this fact since Plato's days.
Not necessarily, if we are expecting the public to be able to see that our Government has made a "Balls up", then you have to question why we can assume that ?it's no good to ask for people's opinion in a referendum and not accepting the result later. MPs have been warned times and times again against referenda.
Brexit is not terminal.
If in 5 years time, it's proven good then it's a good result. If not and most people are then fed up with inflation and want to go back, it will still be a good result, we will be a much more cooperative member.
and long before that.Remember that one of my first ever statements on this thread was the the voters were not racist or bigoted, but misled and lied to, and had been for forty years?
You seem to accept as true that the EU will prove to be unsuccessful, Where is the proof?and long before that.
You seem to accept as true that the EU will continue to be successful.
Where is the proof?
Why have you reached that conclusion? I haven't made such a claim.and long before that.
You seem to accept as true that the EU will continue to be successful.
Where is the proof?
Their arguments usually rely on the consensus that brexit will incur a high price to effect the changes. I for one agree with that. There is a divorce cost for a start.All we can currently say is that the vast majority of experts, in pretty much all relevant topics agree that being a member of the EU is a positive currently.
And for proof I give you... the USANo Nation, or groups of nations can say that the future is full of good things,...
So your logic is that we should jump from the frying pan into the fire?Their arguments usually rely on the consensus that brexit will incur a high price to effect the changes. I for one agree with that. There is a divorce cost for a start.
Whereas it is not certain at all that the EU will continue to be successful.
Am I permitted to say, "No thank you , I'd rather have a "Bounty" even though I don't like coconut?"And for proof I give you... the USA
So you're in agreement with the experts that leaving will have a cost - ie be negative.Their arguments usually rely on the consensus that brexit will incur a high price to effect the changes. I for one agree with that. There is a divorce cost for a start.
Whereas it is not certain at all that the EU will continue to be successful.
No, but I think it's about time that the country should wake up and become more competitive, more self reliant in different ways than relying on that London casino.So your logic is that we should jump from the frying pan into the fire?
And just how do you need to leave the EU to do that?No, but I think it's about time that the country should wake up and become more competitive, more self reliant in different ways than relying on that London casino.
We have been heading for a permanent state of decline in public services, a culture based on celebrity worship, an education geared toward 'soft' pseudo sciences and a permanent structural budget deficit, relying entirely on immigrants for our economic growth.That is logic that's so illogical I can't even grasp where you've got that from.
The snag is Brexit is more the the equivalent ofWe have been heading for a permanent state of decline in public services, a culture based on celebrity worship, an education geared toward 'soft' pseudo sciences and a permanent structural budget deficit, relying entirely on immigrants for our economic growth.
You've got to crack a few eggs to make an omelette.