How about we all try to do less cutting and pasting?Sex abuse gangs view white girls as 'worthless' and 'trash'
05:37, UK, Friday 11 August 2017
18 people have been convicted after a series of cases that have exposed a widespread ring of abuse of under-age girls and vulnerable young women in Newcastle.
Image: Eighteen people were convicted in the final of four trials linked to the case
By Bethany Minelle, News Reporter
Some Muslim men involved in cases where young white girls have been abused view them as "worthless", the head of the UK's Ramadhan Foundation has said.
Mohammed Shafiq told Sky News: "There is a minority of criminals involved in sexual abuse of children in on-street gang grooming who view white girls as worthless.
"They think they can be used in this abhorrent sort of way where they can be seen as trash."
His comments come after 18 gang members - predominantly made up of men from a south Asian background - were convicted of the grooming, abuse and rape of women and girls as young as 15.
The Chief Executive of the Ramadhan Foundation says there is a minority who view white girls as 'worthless'
Video: 'Minority' regard white girls as 'worthless'
Mr Shafiq added: "It's important to address the central issue - why some people from our community think that children can be abused and raped in this disgusting sort of way… There is a process of education that has to go on."
However, he warned against the far right jumping on the issue, saying grooming "affects all communities, and rather than pointing the finger at each other we should come together to defeat it".
President of Newcastle's Asian Society, Davender Kumar Ghai, also told Sky News "it was about race".
He claimed some Muslim Asian men living "in a ghetto in the West End" (of Newcastle) "call white women trash".
Asian Society president says some fundamental matters have to be addressed to stop more abuse cases
Video: Community leader says race is an issue in abuse case
Mr Ghai said: "The people are not very happy. It happened in Rochdale, it happened here. There is definitely something wrong.
"They call white women trash. That's a bad word to use. All the women are the same, and they should learn to respect them."
:: Members of the Newcastle grooming gang in profile
Mr Ghai added: "Islam is a good religion, but firstly, all these holy books - these clerics misinterpret them. And secondly there's no integration - they make a ghetto in the West End."
Social worker Sam Keith shares her thoughts on the Newcastle abuse case
Video: Social worker praises 'selflessness' of abuse victims
Newcastle City Council leader Nick Forbes told Sky News the case was not "swept under the carpet" because of race - and denied it was the defining factor linking the abusers.
"The thing that has linked these people is places like where they work, some of the social networks they move in."
"These are people on the margins of criminality. These are people who've been dealing drugs. These are people who've been abusing women. This is not part of any mainstream religion."
Newcastle city councillor Nick Forbes defends the way the city is tackling sexual exploitation
Video: Councillor 'not targeting' communities on abuse
Similar arrests and prosecutions for child sex abuse rings have taken place in 11 towns and cities across the UK over the last decade, including Oxford, Bristol and Peterborough.
The Labour MP for Rotherham - where at least 1,400 children were sexually over 16 years - said there was a need to acknowledge that most perpetrators in grooming scandals "have been British-Pakistani".
Sarah Champion said people were "more afraid to be called a racist than they are afraid to be wrong about calling out child abuse".
She added: "We've got now hundreds of men, Pakistani men, who have been convicted of this crime - why are we not commissioning research to see what's going on and how we need to change what's going on so it never happens again?"
Posted in:
Newcastle
Northumbria
A fire service image of the aftermath of a house explosion in Alcanar on Wednesday
Spain's King Felipe VI and Spain's Queen Letizia attend a mass
Cromer Pier said it had closed its Theatre Bar
The US territory of Guam is known as a tourist desination
Military vehicles descend on Tal Afar
Youtube
Vine
Google+
About Sky News
About Us
Sky News International
Sky News Library Sales
Site Map
Editorial Guidelines
Supreme Court Live
Sky News Services
Sky News RSS
Sky News For Your Phone
Sky News Radio
Sky Channels
Sky 1
Sky Living
Sky Atlantic
Sky Arts
Sky Cinema
Sky Sports Academy
Bigger Picture
Sky
Er, what cutting? if you know what I meanHow about we all try to do less cutting and pasting?
You need help!As to the rest - when I voted leave I thought we would take an initial economic hit - and was happy to pay that price - ever since the Maastricht Treaty in 92 I knew we had to get out - that this was no longer an economic 'common market' but was aiming to completely take over our rights as an individual country - anybody with half a brain could see that - Major was criminal to have signed that document. I've been waiting 25 years to have my say - and me and 17,410,741 others agreed - like it or not we are coming out - one of the best decisions we ever made.
View attachment 20873
There are some from the Ethiopian Underbelly.I'm confused: you have a huge influx of Muslims from the EU?
Frankly since the Common Market was set up in the late 1940's with the intention of becoming over time a United States of Europe, I would have thought that not knowing that long before the Maastricht Treaty reflected very badly on the intelligence , lack of understanding and failure to check the historical facts of anyone who makes the absurd claim you do.that this was no longer an economic 'common market' but was aiming to completely take over our rights as an individual country - anybody with half a brain could see that
To make your "Gee Whiz" Map more accurate you need to recolour the squares to correctly reflect that fact that there is only 4% difference overallSeems I made it bloody obvious it was a quote - hence it had quotation marks around it - doh - but yes you're right I should have said who wrote it - it was Dominic Lawson.
As to the rest - when I voted leave I thought we would take an initial economic hit - and was happy to pay that price - ever since the Maastricht Treaty in 92 I knew we had to get out - that this was no longer an economic 'common market' but was aiming to completely take over our rights as an individual country - anybody with half a brain could see that - Major was criminal to have signed that document. I've been waiting 25 years to have my say - and me and 17,410,741 others agreed - like it or not we are coming out - one of the best decisions we ever made.
Here's a map for you. Red is leave:
View attachment 20873
The United States of America is as diverse as it comes: several languages, many different cultures and religions all under the same flag. And any idiot who is rich enough and a big enough liar can become president. Um wait a mo, something isn't right...Frankly since the Common Market was set up in the late 1940's with the intention of becoming over time a United States of Europe, I would have thought that not knowing that long before the Maastricht Treaty reflected very badly on the intelligence , lack of understanding and failure to check the historical facts of anyone who makes the absurd claim you do.
"Anyone with more than half a brain would understand that"
This weird notion of the worth of individual Nations being damaged by belonging to such an organisation is astonishing, and History has proved time and time again this is nonsense.
It is a natural and very necessary development in Human Societies to seek to form larger confederations, and the principle has been with us since the stone age.
Petty Nations, with petty ideas of their own importance are a throwback to the middle ages, and trying to make out this is a "Patriotic impulse" pathetic and primitive.
The only difference is here we call them Prime MinisterAnd any idiot who is rich enough and a big enough liar can become president.
The law (it's probably not a law just a general result) - that says we can't democratically vote out the EU commissioners. As people. As people that can claim £200 a day for doing **** all. I'd like the power to do that. Which right now I don't have. Seeing as they are not democratically elected. To me this was about getting power back to do stuff like that. Like Juncker who can put £20,000 on expenses to fly to Italy for the weekend. And right now we can't do anything about that. If thats a law - then I want to be able to change that. Kick him out. And all the hangers-on in Brussels. All that. I want that all gone. Its wrong. Its just ******* wrong and thats one of the big reasons I wanted out. And sure I know for some small manufacturers its going to be tough. I'm sorry. What can I say? Thems is the breaks. But this total lack of accountability has to go. Not just in the EU either. Back here too. But let's start with them - we'll get to us in good time. But we have to keep the vote close. When the ability to vote is so far away - and can not get rid of the people who are making the laws - that's just plain f***ked and we all know that. OK. Rant over.Oxygen James....when IDS came out of a government vote on Brexit he spent the next 10 minutes raving about that he had waited 40 years to have the ability for us to make our own laws. The interviewer caught him out and asked what law would he like to introduce immediately that the EU was currently stopping,he was dumb.
So I ask you the same question,after 25 years,what laws would you like our post Brexit government to introduce that the EU is currently stopping?
KudosDave
Einstein should have stuck to what he was good at - just like Hawkins should at the moment. Just because you know how to mess with atoms does not mean you know anything about economics or how to create genuine wealth.Einstein knew what was wrong with 20th century government and understood that the only fair way was through socialist ideals.
Hermann Göring understood how important lying to the public is in order to guarantee their support.
The idiots who voted for liars and continue to stand by their decision are racists, fascists or both most likely. They are certainly not economists as all the economic arguments for 'Brexit' have been debunked over and over again. The only voices still promulgating opinion to the contrary are among the group of liars and their paid associates who have been found out yet continue to receive the support of the moronic element of society.
View attachment 20881
View attachment 20882
Tom
"All the jobs lack long-term security'. You really do make me laugh. What fricking planet are you living on?Let me help with that
Another day in Fools paradise.
All the things you have quoted are in fact of no great or lasting significance, the employment figures are a joke as most of the "jobs" lack any long term security, and the so call "Brexit Booms" are being presented as being of far greater value than they really are.
Foreign investment is not increasing and very much under a question mark once the present contracts like Siemens in the north sea are complete, and already we are seeing more components coming in from abroad to complete those, and less being used that is made locally.
How you manage to conflate the fact that WE are the ones who don't know what we want into that being the case with the EU, who have been consistent throughout is perhaps the biggest mystery of all.
Perhaps you should try a few whiffs of oxygen to clear these nonsense notions from your head,
You really haven't the slightest notion of what is at stake here, have you?
just interest in money, the usual obsession of those without a conscience.
Good Tory thinking, or so they believe, but actually poison to the nation's future.
And do give up with these second hand slogans from the Gutter press
"the Leninists of the anti-Brexit resistance"
You only make yourself look silly, and you are doing a splendid job of that anyway, by championing a lost cause that will damage our future, because you fancy betting on an outsider.
Remember this significant fact; Brexit was brought into being on lies and False promises, and the villains of the piece behind this Farce had no idea then, or now ,of how to make it work.
And you have faith in these buffoons even after they have proved liars and incompetents?
There's a old saying about belief
"lie to me once, more fool you
lie to me twice, more fool me"
Still believing the lies, Oh Dear!
And then to get cocky about doing so, and take pride in being foolish?
Amazing.
... Hi Oxygen, if you had the patience of Job, you could read through the back posting on this thread and be informed that there actually is accountability, and democracy in action. As a summary.....The law (it's probably not a law just a general result) - that says we can't democratically vote out the EU commissioners. As people. As people that can claim £200 a day for doing **** all. I'd like the power to do that. Which right now I don't have. Seeing as they are not democratically elected. To me this was about getting power back to do stuff like that. Like Juncker who can put £20,000 on expenses to fly to Italy for the weekend. And right now we can't do anything about that. If thats a law - then I want to be able to change that. Kick him out. And all the hangers-on in Brussels. All that. I want that all gone. Its wrong. Its just ******* wrong and thats one of the big reasons I wanted out. And sure I know for some small manufacturers its going to be tough. I'm sorry. What can I say? Thems is the breaks. But this total lack of accountability has to go. Not just in the EU either. Back here too. But let's start with them - we'll get to us in good time. But we have to keep the vote close. When the ability to vote is so far away - and can not get rid of the people who are making the laws - that's just plain f***ked and we all know that. OK. Rant over.
The EU wants to set a precedence of ECJ control over its citizens while residing in the UK after Brexit.Oxygen James....when IDS came out of a government vote on Brexit he spent the next 10 minutes raving about that he had waited 40 years to have the ability for us to make our own laws. The interviewer caught him out and asked what law would he like to introduce immediately that the EU was currently stopping,he was dumb.
So I ask you the same question,after 25 years,what laws would you like our post Brexit government to introduce that the EU is currently stopping?
KudosDave
is it a typo? do you mean precedence?If that is agreed then surely it should be reciprocated for any other country who has its citizens residing in the EU to take president over ECJ law.