Forgive me if I am wrong, but was not your contention in that previous post that the" lie" was that they were claiming 59% of 3 jab boosted when the figure was only supportive of 50%?. Was not your contention in the previous post that "they" were claiming much higher infection rates.Yes you do, every time and once again now. In what way does your 60%, agreeing with my NHS 59%, support your contention that the govenment isn't lying, just being careless?
It doesn't, the government contention of 75% was a deliberate wilful lie and nothing to do with carelesness so don't try to show otherwise when the margin of error is so great and their statement impossible at present.
I'm getting bloody fed up with the way you constantly butt in trying to undermine my factual posts with this sort of idiocy. I'm providing a research service to members in what is an English political matter and bugger all to do with you in Ireland.
You've been on the attack continuously for two years now, trying to disprove my contentions which have all proved to be correct and officially accepted in many cases.
My early 2020 contention that we in London would benefit from the massive early infection we suffered, proven by all outcomes since.
My contention I made early in this year that the vaccines were not all they were being hyped up to be, now easily seen.
My early contention that natural immunity from prior infection as at least as good as vaccination and probably a bit better, now also supported by lower London death rates and belatedly by the government's chief statistician nationally.
And now my contention with clear proofs that the government is deliberately lying in a propaganda campaign to grossly exaggerate the benefits of the vaccines, this for purely political purposes.
You have disagreed with all these contentions when I originally made them, your posts all on record, so you've been shown to be wrong each time.
.
And for the record, At no stage have I ever stated that prior infection does not give some level of immunity. Perhaps to a level even superior to a single or maybe a double jab of a vaccine. What I do dispute is whether repeated sub clinical infections of COVID gives any immunity... I wish and hope it might, but I cannot believe it. I have not found your assertion, if that was it was, compelling.
And again and again , I refrain from discussing the political implications on mainland UK..that as you rightly say is none of my business. .But the Science is. Indeed I may have as much of a stake as yourself as I have family in London and Swansea and Liverpool, and relations all the way from Aberdeen to St Ives
There is a global campaign to get as many persons global vaccinated as possible, and it supercedes any petty political squabbles in the UK. The current best known facts are that a treble dose of any of these vaccines reduces the clinical effects of a Covid infection to close on 90%, reducing pro rata the hospital admission numbers. That a single or double dose or indeed a prior infection ,even if acquired many months ago, reduces the severity of the Omnicron infection into the lungs. We have yet to see how serious the Omnicron virus is in unvaccinated populations when it sweeps through the Southern USA