Well taxation was not on the agenda... But of course you are co rrect. It is typical for a State to offer tax concessions at the start of a new technology bin order to" prime the pump ",and because economies of scale have not swung into action.
You might need to consult a more erudite electrican. The main fuse entry point can easily handle the 80amp @230 in the UK or in our case in Ireland it is 65amp at 220vrms , or 15KW. The spur would be taken off at that junction to feed the 7kw auxiary feed . The point about house wiring at the utility entry point is that it can supply the maximum rated current indefinitely. The aforementioned power shower also needs its dedicated power feed and separate fusing because the local fuse box or circuit breaker is not designed for those loads. .Indeed it is the local electrian wiring these up from the fuse box who causes problems.
Perhaps you should read my post..
I never mentioned home not being able to cope, ofcourse it has capability to do so, if you are content with a 7kw (continuous) supply... The problem arises, as both I explained, and in link, when numerous houses draw high levels of charge. The average consumer in UK draws 2kw(at the moment) ...so substations are designed around a fairly low average. (varies regionally) It's exactly why board are saying grid will cope by 2030.There are plans to upgrade cabling to cope with envisaged higher averages and a hope that most users will use intelligent /timed charging rather than plugging in when arriving home.
There needs to be changes. Without them our grid can not cope.
Like you say, you have an 11kw shower... You really think system could cope as is with you and many others showering after work, plugging their cars in and heating house with electricity. (gas boilers will be banned)
Think you are dreaming Danidl. The system was never designed for all these changes, no matter what they say.
How much redundancy would have been designed into grid when it was being developed.
9 and 11 kW showers, 7kw charging and house heating are all recent.. That probably represents a 2 or 3 fold (or more) increase in average cinsumtion. No way was system originally designed for all that. Like I told you earlier they are aiming for 2030 for grid to be able to cope.With how much increase? Who knows. Time will tell.
Seems to me time to get in is now. Before there are limits on number allowed home charging and before government start charging all the ecar users to pay for all the infrastructure improvements needed.
Shell, BP and Texaco paid for most petrol stations to be built. At moment tax payers are paying for the planned infrastructure.??? Why should I pay for a charging post built by council or government.
To put it simply domestic home supply capability has lots of redundancy built into it for consumers safety. That redundancy is not replicated throughout system and leads people to think system is way more capable than it actually is.There are weak links which need sorting...
Speak with someone who has worked in the industry.