I fully agree with the value of statistical analysis and that did flag up a discrepancy whereby 6000 votes in a Michigan county .. Antrim by the way, had been erroneous attributed to Biden.. But it was the internal auditors who picked it up. What was very noticeable on the frantic night of counting, how King on CNN was able to predict votes ..for both sides based on ward and counties. So what anomaly are you proposing?. Trump might have expected more military votes , but then people like Kelly and Matthis had strong profiles and calling war dead Losers does not sell well in military towns.There are a lot of questions about whether those 76.45 million votes are real and whether the real ones are valid. Any statistical analysis of the voting patterns and results shows that they're unusual to the point where a statistician would say impossible.
What people, especially the fraudsters don't realise is that there are natural patterns behind data, some of them are very counter-intuitive. One would always expect data to follow these natural patterns. If they don't, then the pattern is no longer natural and somebody needs to explain why. This is nothing new. People have been using these tests for all sorts of data to determine it's validity. I can guarantee that every bank transaction you make will be subject to these pattern tests. I was a quality manager for 20 years, during which time we used all sorts of statistical tests and pattern analysis to determine whether things were running right. When the analysis gave warning signs, somebody would have to jump in and figure out what was going on.
The interesting thing is that in most of the uncontested states, when you apply these data tests, everything comes out as reasonably normal and consistent with previous elections, but when you apply them to the contested states, there are truly significant anomalies. Somebody needs to find out why. Maybe there are reasons, but as far as I'm concerned, nobody has found a plausible reason yet. The DOJ are now investigating, and Biden supporters and the BBC are going nuts. Hopefully, they'll make an explanation, but I expect not. Like in the UK with the Grooming gang investigation, what they find will be so shocking that they wouldn't dare publish it. You only have to look at the DOJ Durham probe that was supposed to conclude last February. Everybody knows who the bad guys are and exactly what they did, but nothing has happened yet.
As with most things, it's not the actual deeds that give the crime away, but the attempts to cover it up.
What did happen is that both sides were energised , to vote and for different reasons.
Is your anomaly that GoP did fine,but Trump did not?.
Had the Democrats stuffed the system, would they nit have whitewashed tge Senate as well?.