Yes, it's that time of the month, but she said it should be OK tomorrow.You're still not getting it vfr
Yes, it's that time of the month, but she said it should be OK tomorrow.You're still not getting it vfr
Typical of Chinese manufactures getting it wrong. Trump ordered 2 million hats which arrived with a misprint, they read MAGA instead of GAGA...non-returnable of course.One picture shows a cult leader preaching to his cult, the other shows some Biden supporters walking through a car park.
If you are going to post picture puzzles you'll have to do better than that.
As you've already said Trump rallies are entertainment, the cult followers go along wearing their Chinese manufactured MAGA hats and waving their flags made from Chinese polyester. They are not there to hear about policies or intentions, which is just as well because Trump has none for the people's benefit, only his own.
so where do you think the core values of the Labour party and/or Labour movement are?But Blair was not left. He was a neoconservative, not just politically or in terms of foreign policy (let's gloss over the small matter of destabilising the middle east for several generations and causing Syria, Libya etc shall we?). Also in his chancellor brown's raid on pension funds; all part of architecture of the 08 meltdown. Until boris brexit (and the cognitive dissonant twats who voted for him) came along it was hard to imagine any uk govt could inflict more damage than the blair/brown did
That's not what she said to me...ask her again!Yes, it's that time of the month, but she said it should be OK tomorrow.
But the fact still remains that Corbyn and Abbott would have ****** it up to an even greater extent. The Tories have messed up by trying to focus on the economy and health, but not getting either right. Corbyn and Co. wouldn't have focussed on either. They would have continued Jew Baiting, researching whether "Nightingale" has any links to slavery and generally getting fuckall done. We would be in even worse state under Corbyn.Aside from care homes, lying about overall deaths, ppe, test and trace, delaying the lockdown, in march as now, opening pubs and restaurants, etc, etc. (teres a reason were practically doing the worst in the world). as a conservative I can imagine it's easy to rationalise all of that with asides for the promise of paying less tax. As you did with the mass murder in care homes.
Soon you'll be able to sell it for £4.75 + P&P per sheet..Head's up everybody ..... a relative has just sent a text from outside a large ASDA supermarket down here on the windy coast. Pandemonium inside, car park full of queuing people with little room for cars.
It's started already, I have 500 toilet rolls which I can sell to forum members for only £4.75 each + P&P
Used..Soon you'll be able to sell it for £4.75 + P&P per sheet..
That, is your fantasy about labour. Not reality. They would have done something like adern's labour in New Zealand. I have a lot of sympathy for your position. If I voted myself willingly into where we are now I'd have to engage in industrial levels of rationalisation. I believe it's called cognitive dissonance. It will take considerably more bad news before that wears off I'm afraid.But the fact still remains that Corbyn and Abbott would have ****** it up to an even greater extent. The Tories have messed up by trying to focus on the economy and health, but not getting either right. Corbyn and Co. wouldn't have focussed on either. They would have continued Jew Baiting, researching whether "Nightingale" has any links to slavery and generally getting fuckall done. We would be in even worse state under Corbyn.
As so often, not in any way answering my showing Tony Blair to be by far the worst UK party leader in modern times, doing immense lasting damage to their electoral chances. As I mentioned, it was by common consent that Labour's chance of gaining power were destroyed by the rise of the SNP. Prior to that Labour only won or came close with a near clean sweep of the Scottish seats. Their loss was due to Blair's devolution policy, certainly not Labour's left wing policies.it's the other way round.
You seem to identify Labour's core values with its far left militants.
The far left enrols itself into the Labour party and destroys its chances from within.
I remember Michael Foot, Kinnock, Smith, they all had troubles with the far left before Blair.
Only Blair managed to shut the far left in his party, that results in victory for Labour in 3 elections.
Best thing for Labour is to rid itself of the far left.
In corbyn and mc Donnel's economic manifesto that balanced growth and redistribution. That wasn't the far left parody right wing nuts try to portray it like. It emphasised state investment for economic growth. But not for the benefit of the offshore companies that sponsor boris et al.so where do you think the core values of the Labour party and/or Labour movement are?
with the far left or with Blair/Brown?
with Corbyn or with Starmer? and before you said, Starmer is Corbynista, he certainly is not.
so you would equate NZ's Adern with JC and Abbott?That, is your fantasy about labour. Not reality. They would have done something like adern's labour in New Zealand.
How about a st valentine's day massacre (a war crime even breitbart doesnt officially acknowledge)?Yes, it's that time of the month, but she said it should be OK tomorrow.
The Labour party's core values are socialism and humanity and have been ever since Keir Hardy founded it, they are certainly not Blairs destructive values.so where do you think the core values of the Labour party and/or Labour movement are?
with the far left or with Blair/Brown?
Starmer had declared he does believe in Corbyn's policies and has said he will follow them. In truth his key policy is expediency. However, since his only chance of power lies not within anything he can do, but by there being a collapse of the Tory vote, we'll probably never find out.with Corbyn or with Starmer? and before you said, Starmer is Corbynista, he certainly is not.
Not quite. But up the same street. the absurd parody - from overt racists on the right wing of conservative politics - to discredit more egalitarian politics by portraying corbyn as a jew hating trotskyist is profoundly machiavellian. And wearing quite thin.so you would equate NZ's Adern with JC and Abbott?
That tells you everything. There is nothing else to say. He’s a lost cause.so you would equate NZ's Adern with JC and Abbott?
Character assassination is pretty much all you do, huh? Try. To. Kickstart. The. Frontal. Lobes. For. A. Change. Adern's core policies are about social and racial justice. Very much as in the corbyn/mc Donnell manifesto.That tells you everything. There is nothing else to say. He’s a lost cause.
who accuses JC as a racist? Nobody, but he is insensitive toward the victims of racism in his party when he was in charge. When the EHRC report came out, instead of showing regret and empathy to the victims, he could only think of himself, declaring that only 0.03% of the membership was accused. Would that matter to the victims?Not quite. But up the same street. the absurd parody - from overt racists on the right wing of conservative politics - to discredit more egalitarian politics by portraying corbyn as a jew hating trotskyist is profoundly machiavellian. And wearing quite thin.
I've got a couple of pre-loved camera's I got off of ebay, I'd better get the sanitizer wipes out on them."pre-loved"
Corbyn stood by and did nothing whilst Jew Baiting took place. His leadership team interfered with internal Jew Hate investigations. The EHRC found that Labour has an anti-semitism problem and produced pages of evidence to support it. The EHRC said that Labour must accept that there is a problem if they are to stand any chance of resolving it.Not quite. But up the same street. the absurd parody - from overt racists on the right wing of conservative politics - to discredit more egalitarian politics by portraying corbyn as a jew hating trotskyist is profoundly machiavellian. And wearing quite thin.