Flecc, Your position on this is not logical.No Danidl, that is not their personal behaviour I'm speaking of, that is simply their "working" from home or just being laid off, meaning they are not commuting on the underground. Same for the buses.
After all, nobody in their right mind is going to spend all that time off work in the weeks of marvellous weather we've been having, travelling in the underground.
It's what the 90% have been doing when not in the underground you've conveniently ignored, so please stop wrongly guessing about what is happening under my nose here.
The rates of infection are currently much lower because we took a very big double size hit at first, a simple matter of sooner or later for the more vulnerable in our crowded city. You really are a very slow learner.
.
If they are not going on the underground.
If they are working from home
If they have been furloughed
If they are not going to theatres or football stadia or pubs
Then they are whether voluntarily or otherwise removing themselves from potential zones of infection. The fact that small groups are a bit closer than optimal while going down footpaths is very small beer. You cannot be infected without coming into contact with infected people.
Whether you explicitly say it or not ,your argument is that all or a majority of the vulnerable in London are already culled, ..so that is a variation on the herd immunity argument. There is no evidence to support that.
If and when the numbers on the underground recover to their pre CV19 levels .and or the pubs reopen and commerce and sports and the economy rebounds, then the London numbers will accelerate. Hopefully the death rate will not accelerate as badly, as the treatment options are improving.