All of brought upon herself. She married into Royalty and with that came duty. Duty which she would have fully understood beforehand. She and Harry are now trying to shirk that duty, so the press will pick up on that.in constrast to our gutter press, here is an alternative view from the Guardian:
QUOTE:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jan/12/now-harry-and-meghan-are-going-time-to-look-a-true-royal-horrors
If Meghan never, unlike Diana, Princess of Wales, had to run from photographers, she has been subjected, courtesy in particular of the Daily Mail, to a new, permissible variation on press harassment: relentless, condescending censure informed by what 70 female MPs recently described as “outdated, colonial undertones”. One day, a reprimand might focus on Meghan’s relationship with her father, another on her tights, her friends, her “bump-boasting”, her extravagance, her ruthlessness, her unhappy staff, her christening photographs, her meanness to Kate. Not forgetting her Vogue editing, chapel dissing, Queen snubbing, baby showering, baby holding, baby hiding and Harry controlling. In the light of this trolling, the press’s earlier pursuit of Diana practically radiates mutual respect.
Look, there are millions of people in the U.K. who are having to cope with a harsh life, but without the privilege, the money, the access and the shielding. The pair of them need to grow up and develop a sense of reality.