I think you are missing the points I was making thoughout this post sequence.Really? Don't you think traffic allover the SE (and London) would be significantly worse without the M25. I use that road a lot - it takes a lot of people and goods from A to B. It is a very popular road. Imagine without it. Have you seen what happens when it gets blocked and everybody dives onto the local roads to make the same journeys? Its mad.
Firstly I was comparing the M25 to having the two originally planned London motorway boxes instead, not being without all three.
Second that I made the point that the M25 produced all the traffic you complain of, encouraging more traffic by its presence. You are using it because it's there. It's too often missed that building extra roads produces more traffic than there would have been if they weren't built. Los Angeles is the nightmare that illustrates it only too well, that there can never be enough roads, they fill as fast as they are built.
Third that we should have been heading for a modern rail future instead of an all road one. Convoys of articulated trucks with a driver in each is a daft way to shift bulk goods over long distances and equally daft is thousands of cars with one person in each.
The sequence of my four posts about this starts with this one
.
Last edited: