Most Conservatives are ugly (even if it's only on the inside)Some might consider it a bit on the glass houses front, perhaps:
"Yes, but in the morning I'll be sober but you and I will still be ugly".
Most Conservatives are ugly (even if it's only on the inside)Some might consider it a bit on the glass houses front, perhaps:
"Yes, but in the morning I'll be sober but you and I will still be ugly".
Did WS become, umm, less attractive, when he switched from being Liberal?Most Conservatives are ugly (even if it's only on the inside)
You can't switch from being Liberal to Conservative, He must have been Conservative to start with (on the inside) Like Tony Blair.Did WS become, umm, less attractive, when he switched from being Liberal?
you are splitting unpleasant hairs. speaking as if rape could be acceptable. this is imitating trump style hate speech, carefully phrasing misogyny, racism in innuendo so it becomes semantically defensible. this establishes an increasingly hate fueled norm that suits populists. It is even more disturbing than it seems.Except that he included the word "even", which infers that he wouldn't go that far even if she were worthy of it.
Can you really be so naive? he did no such thing.I agree ….. But Oyster inferred That Carl Benjamin would have raped her if she was attractive..
One of the problems these days is that people do not know the history of their own country, and here is a classic case for youYou can't switch from being Liberal to Conservative, He must have been Conservative to start with (on the inside) Like Tony Blair.
This is a direct quote from Oyster.Can you really be so naive? he did no such thing.
Read what I put "he was Conservative on the inside"One of the problems these days is that people do not know the history of their own country, and here is a classic case for you
Churchill did it twice
https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/changing-parties/
Party rat? Churchill has long been criticized for switching political parties (“ratting” in Parliamentary terms), which he did not once but twice. He left the Conservatives (Tories) for the Liberals in 1904, only to rejoin the Conservatives in 1925.
The problem now is that there is a tendency for large numbers of people to judge political figures by their flamboyant character rather than their wisdom, and the cult of celebrity clouds their judgement, hence a lying buffoon with no talent for anything like Boris Johnson can achieve wealth and fame and create untold damage to the nation in the process.you are splitting unpleasant hairs. speaking as if rape could be acceptable. this is imitating trump style hate speech, carefully phrasing misogyny, racism in innuendo so it becomes semantically defensible. this establishes an increasingly hate fueled norm that suits populists. It is even more disturbing than it seems.
Yoda's saying about fear being the path to the dark side comes to mind (fear leads to anger. anger leads to hate. hate leads to suffering)
Do you understand the meaning of the words possible and inference?This is a direct quote from Oyster.
Possible inference, indeed, one that is hard to avoid, is that he would rape her if she were attractive to him.
You posted thisYou can't switch from being Liberal to Conservative, He must have been Conservative to start with (on the inside) Like Tony Blair.
Read it again, it's obvious what I mean.....I am not getting into a 4 page argument with you.You posted this
"You can't switch from being Liberal to Conservative, "
It was as I proved incorrect.
"He must have been Conservative to start with (on the inside) Like Tony Blair."
Is not factual, just a supposition , though I do believe like you Blair was always a Conservative both inside and outside.
You are fun aren't you? you came on here to create arguments in support of a right wing loony, (no two!) and have argued with everyone who reacted to your posts, and now you are trying the age old blame everyone else for what you are doing with this?Read it again, it's obvious what I mean.....I am not getting into a 4 page argument with you.
I honestly believe you could argue with your self for days on end … if you want to believe
you "proved yourself correct" I hope it made you very happy.
You are fun aren't you? you came on here to create arguments in support of a right wing loony, (no two!) and have argued with everyone who reacted to your posts, and now you are trying the age old blame everyone else for what you are doing with this?
"I honestly believe you could argue with your self for days on end"
perfect description of what you do isn't it?
And your fan boy campaign is actually nothing to do with the thread, just you kidding us along for a laugh.
My original post......Do you understand the meaning of the words possible and inference?
Possible
"
that may exist or happen, but that is not certain or probable.
Inference
"Inferences are steps in reasoning, moving from premises to logical consequences; etymologically, the word infer means to "carry forward". Inference is theoretically traditionally divided into deduction and induction, a distinction that in Europe dates at least to Aristotle. Wikipedia
Also, I have been discussing his words. Those words might say, or imply, things that he would not actually do. But simply using of those words, in the way he has, is vile.Do you understand the meaning of the words possible and inference?
Possible
"
that may exist or happen, but that is not certain or probable.
Inference
"Inferences are steps in reasoning, moving from premises to logical consequences; etymologically, the word infer means to "carry forward". Inference is theoretically traditionally divided into deduction and induction, a distinction that in Europe dates at least to Aristotle. Wikipedia
More than you do apparentlyMy original post......
"Oyster inferred That Carl Benjamin would have raped her if she was attractive.".
Do you understand the meaning of inferred ?
Dont break the ceasefire OG, come on, be a good boy. Things have been quite pleasant in here for a while...More than you do apparently
The problem here is you can't have another ref. until the current one is finally carried out and we leave.I like this "enough of Brexit let's rebuild Britain instead" seems like a decent plan to me, more details here.
If Labour really wants to move on, it has to back a second referendum | Tom Kibasi
The party has to make the case that Brexit simply isn’t worth it, says Tom Kibasi of the Institute for Public Policy Researchwww.theguardian.com
The ceasefire was between the two of us, remember?Dont break the ceasefire OG, come on, be a good boy. Things have been quite pleasant in here for a while...