We must disagree on this. Whether he was a turncoat, a lier ,a pragmatist,or a con artist a huge disappointment, is not being discussed. He was endorsed by party which uses a red rose as their symbol. A symbol linked to the Labour party.Why would I disagree, a political party position is one of beliefs and I'm surprised you can't see that. And your use of sect is just emotive.
No, it was Blair who was revisionist, completely changing political position once having gained leadership by dishonesty.
Blair is a moderate Conservative and never was a Labour socialist. His policies such as founding the Academies, support for PPI and privatisation could never be described as Labour or socialist. He should have stood for election for the correct party.
.
Yes, I did use the religious sect motif deliberately.and it was emotive and over the top, in order to to show that your beatification of previous Labour icons was also heading that way.
Incidentally,and it will give you no comfort, but Mr Blair is remembered more fondly here for his part in the GFA. That narrative chooses to ignore the important part that Mr Major also played at an earlier stage.