No, no, i didn`t mean rejoining the UK, keeping your present status politically but leaving the EU and negotiating alongside the UK.
Interesting. Would that not to negate everything and revert back to 1923 ? All the pain, no gain, attempting to have embassies in 160 countries ? Economic war? . Trying to negotiate all those trade deals , including one with our near neighbours in NewryNo, no, i didn`t mean rejoining the UK, keeping your present status politically but leaving the EU and negotiating alongside the UK.
You`re missing my point, that wouldn`t change, neither would your trade with the rest of the UK, everything inter Irl/UK would be as it is now, i`m talking of an economic agreement along with the UK not a political one.Interesting. Would that not to negate everything and revert back to 1923 ? All the pain, no gain, attempting to have embassies in 160 countries ? Economic war? . Trying to negotiate all those trade deals , including one with our near neighbours in Newry
Like every other option it deserves to be considered.
This is surprising, considering that this contributor has expended a huge amount of effort supporting Brexit it must surely be galling to find the public just want to get it over with!I did not expect reading this from the Torygraph:
The trouble with Brexit, they should have said, is that it will be monumentally tedious. So monumentally tedious, in fact, that beleaguered voters will actually beg their MPs to make the media shut up about it. Such has been the experience of Tracey Crouch, Tory MP for Chatham & Aylesford.
“People come up to me in the street,” she revealed in an interview yesterday, “and say, ‘Can you ask the BBC to stop reporting on Brexit?’”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/21/revealed-last-remain-could-have-stopped-brexit/
The free state has done rather well for itself in recent years so I see no reason why it should shoot itself in the foot just because the UK has got itself into a bit of a pickle.No, no, i didn`t mean rejoining the UK, keeping your present status politically but leaving the EU and negotiating alongside the UK.
I think it would inside the EU ... 60% of our trade is with the mainland EU and 40% with the UK. US firms use Ireland as a gateway into Europe, the fact that we speak in a language they understand don't hurt either . Its a benefit NI has lost out on, but should really be in a position to benefit from, as there is a significant us population with Ulster roots. But outside the EU they would have no interest.You`re missing my point, that wouldn`t change, neither would your trade with the rest of the UK, everything inter Irl/UK would be as it is now, i`m talking of an economic agreement along with the UK not a political one.
Big question of course is will the people of ROI be better off in or out of the EU on the day of UK leaving?
David Davis 'must be joking if he wants EU to compromise on Brexit'
“The legal consequence of Brexit is that the UK financial service providers lose their EU passport. This passport allows them to offer their services to a market of 500 million consumers and 22 million businesses."
The pronouncement is bad news for the City, where over 5,400 British firms rely on passporting rights to bring in £9 billion in revenue every year to Britain. The BBA has said the loss of passporting would be “disruptive, costly and time-consuming”.
It also comes the same day as the EU announces where it will relocating the European Banking Authority, an EU agency currently based in London, after Brexit.
Danidl.....BULLYING BY THE EU...
Tusk and Barnier have got this all wrong if they think such threats will sway the UK electorate....if anything it will strengthen our resolve to rid ourselves of this bullying EU....Brits dont like being threatened.
I have friends in the City,moving these contracts away from London is not easy,London is very good at these tasks,Paris is too expensive and tax ridden,Frankfurt is boring.
KudosDave
That isn't true, is it? whatever happens we are commited to pay outstanding debts, I really don't know why this bothers you so much.The deal may be unattractive in which case we pay nothing,
Read my posting again...I said we should pay our commitments,that should be a sum which is calculable,I assume our team has that figure.That isn't true, is it? whatever happens we are commited to pay outstanding debts, I really don't know why this bothers you so much.
We should stop messing about, discuss that they want, reach agreement, pay up and get on with it.
Why all the ranting and raving that the press are obviously successfully inflaming people with?
Our need is quite simply the difference between these two situations
On the one hand one side will be in dire straits if it doesn't get a good deal
On the other a much bigger group will take a hit that it can shrug off by delaying some projects.
When faced with a situation like this you simply have to face facts and not live in cloud cuckoo "What if" land.
Pay up, smile and move on.
Better still accept that Brexit is a wrong 'un and find a way to cancel it.
It bothers me because Barnier is in the driving seat,we don't appear to even be in the car. Every time the EU says it wants more money,May goes away and squeezes Hammond (not a nice thought) for money which we haven't got unless we borrow it.That isn't true, is it? whatever happens we are commited to pay outstanding debts, I really don't know why this bothers you so much.
We should stop messing about, discuss that they want, reach agreement, pay up and get on with it.
Why all the ranting and raving that the press are obviously successfully inflaming people with?
Our need is quite simply the difference between these two situations
On the one hand one side will be in dire straits if it doesn't get a good deal
On the other a much bigger group will take a hit that it can shrug off by delaying some projects.
When faced with a situation like this you simply have to face facts and not live in cloud cuckoo "What if" land.
Pay up, smile and move on.
Better still accept that Brexit is a wrong 'un and find a way to cancel it.
Certainly, downhill!
And if they are not?It bothers me because Barnier is in the driving seat,we don't appear to even be in the car. Every time the EU says it wants more money,May goes away and squeezes Hammond (not a nice thought) for money which we haven't got unless we borrow it.
May is a puppet tweeked by the bastard 50 ( or is it 30) who don't care what happens to the economy,NHS,trade just as long as they get their petty bit of power,but she is a hopeless negotiator. There are times when buying something ,that silence is a powerful tool and less haste gets the other side desperate,May hasnt learnt that,maybe Davis has.
We don't need to walk away just don't jump every time the EU says jump,the EU will soon realise that we are looking for 'more progress' on their side,the EU are probably more desperate for money than we are,time to test that.
KudosDave
the EU does not ask us to pay for a good trade deal. It is just that this tory government does not want customs union, the ECJ and FOM. Therefore, the only deal the EU can do is CETA type, on goods that attract already low duty. Our government wants passporting for our banks and mutual recognition of EU/BSI standards - the EU may give us some but will probably not enough for you and I to sell our stuff on ebay, amazon or Paypal to EU27 customers after brexit.The deal may be unattractive in which case we pay nothing,it may be a wonderful deal and we pay a lot to get it or interpolate between extremes.
Thank you for standing up for us, but in this case unnecessary. Ireland does not have a veto on a trade deal. Assuming a trade deal is struck, qualified majority voting will be the way a deal is ratified. It is only if there is no deal and the UK seeks to extend the negotiating window that unanimous consent is required. Anyway I can report that our Leo is no shrinking violet. He is also a medical doctor, and you don't get qualified here in that discipline unless you perform in the top 1 to 2% %.. academically.In the light of Arlene Foster's criticism of the Taoiseach, perhaps she and others should recognise this fact about 'Brexit':
View attachment 22213
Tom
I don't sell on the e-bay to EU countries,all my e-bay sales are to the home market. I don't think WTO tariffs are going to be any good for the UK but also no good for the EU,30% plus on food,10% on cars but engineering items are low tariff. We can grow more at home but exports to the EU for our farmers will be difficult,maybe that will end up good for our farmers.the EU does not ask us to pay for a good trade deal. It is just that this tory government does not want customs union, the ECJ and FOM. Therefore, the only deal the EU can do is CETA type, on goods that attract already low duty. Our government wants passporting for our banks and mutual recognition of EU/BSI standards - the EU may give us some but will probably not enough for you and I to sell our stuff on ebay, amazon or Paypal to EU27 customers after brexit.