Search results

Fine, I’d be ok with another vote. I think it would return the same result, leave. Then what?

Really? Do you really believe that?

No flecc, the statement was that we will ask the British people and we will carry out their decision. Never was it stated that we will hold a referendum and then have a think about the result. That would have caused outrage. Regardless of the legal position, what was promised must be...

Danidl, I understand the legal position, now. However, as an average Joe, the referendum was sold to the British public as being their decision and a decision which parliament would carry out. It was almost those exact words which the then Prime Minister used. Never once was the word advisory...

Absolutely. A statement was made that the British public would be asked and their decision implemented. That was when they thought the result would be remaining though. It all went tits up for them when the result was leave. The word advisory was not used until after the unexpected result was...

Broxtowe voted to leave by close to a 10% majority. To pay total disregard for that majority is dictatorial. Jackbooted politics. Why are you so outraged by the words which were allegedly spoken to Soubry, yet when a baying mob of left wing thugs tried to physically attack Nigel Farage...

There was close to a 10% differential in Anna Soubry’ constituency in favour of leave. She was elected to represent the views of the majority of her constituents and she isn’t doing that. It’s not really sensible saying she is representing the views of the minority. Where do you draw the line...

Thank you for the apology, which I accept. I would also like to offer you an apology for referring to you as a fool. Right, with that out of the way. I think Anna Soubry’s stance is rather dictatorial and undemocratic. A rather Jackbooted approach to politics I would say.

Show me the post where I said that. You are quoting words written by another contributor to the thread (Fingers in post #43730 to be exact) not me. This is a very good example of how you read information, misinterpret the meaning and then regurgitate it as garbage on the pages of the forum...

I wasn’t. I don’t condone abuse. I am saying that there is no consistency in dealing with abusers. That point has been made very clarion In every one of my posts, yet you can’t seen to read it. Why are you having difficulty understanding?

Your previous statement makes no sense. It’s like someone asking, do you drive a Ford or a Skoda, and you replying, I’ll have a cup of tea please.

I said right at the start that it doesn’t make it right. That was the clue, but you missed it either intentionally or because you have reading difficulties. The point is, there has to be a consistency in the approach to taking action against abuse and there isn’t. When it’s levelled against some...

Good point. It doesn’t seem to matter when some people are subject to abuse or even a very real threat of violence. The abuse levelled against Soubry is nothing by comparison to that Farage experienced. It doesn’t make either course of action correct, but there has to be consistency when dealing...

Many on here have been subject to similar abuse and worse by the staunch remain supporters. It doesn’t make it right, but as I say, if the Jackboots fit.......

I’m afraid it’s a case of, if the Jackboots and slash-peaked cap fits.........

“More than 50 MPs have called on the head of Britain's largest police force to improve their response to abusive protesters outside Parliament. Writing to Met Police commissioner Cressida Dick, the MPs cited "serious concerns" about the "deteriorating public order and security situation". Hang...

Well I did wonder what the point of it all was. I suppose if they managed to get a few shots of thick coppers made good, shirt sleeves rolled up, preposterous peaked caps at a jaunty angle & looking on top of it all, then at least it’s not been a total waste of time, money and resources. Just...

I think the confusing taxation messages from the government are the major factor in deterring people for driving a new car. There exists a kind of unspoken message that Diesel will be hit with penalties and to some extent engine size will be a factor. However, there is no clarity and that makes...

Not Brexit related. People don’t know what to drive because of unclear and confused messages from the government regarding taxation. People haven’t been buying cars for years, they can’t afford them. They have just stupidly been getting further into debt in order to be able to DRIVE the latest...

Potatoes!