Search results

no I think the general consensus of the polls was that remain would win. Some got a nasty surprise and some got a pleasant one

they are all prone to lies and exaggeration when it suits. If we had to nullify every vote because of it we would be having many more elections. What did Blair say?? 24 hours to save the NHS or some such bs. I don't recall mass hysteria over that, or many of the other lies that have got...

one thing that was in it was a promise to accept whatever the result was and deliver it. He obviously did not expect the result he got

it is now up to whatever government we have to make sure that is not the case. I'm sure many businesses paying protection money to criminal organisations must have the same doubts

so that£ 9 million spent on the leaflets (not available to leave) was just a waste of money

it is all the fault of the MP's who have tried to stop it happening

that we leave the EU as agreed by the referendum. The EU have made it as difficult as they could to stop us leaving in the hopes that we would change our minds. They have been aided in this by negotiators from the UK who do not want to leave and who are trying to make it look as if they are...

Flecc we both know that both camps were economical with the truth, saying whatever they thought would win people over. There was no mention of any deal in the leaflet that was delivered, but there was a promise to give the decision to the people and to deliver on that decision

why fascists. Think that's rubbish. Very easy to label people with opposing views

how do you know that. the question was 'do you want to stay or leave'. no mention made of deals one way or the other

why are they extremists. Surely they are the ones who are trying to deliver what was voted for and it is the people like Soubry, who agreed to the vote taking place and said they would implement it, and then have tried relentlessly to try and overturn it. They are the extremists. I am still of...

in the same way that Corbyn did at last GE by promising the moon to young people to get them to vote labour even though he knew he couldn't deliver it

whoever you prefer I don't think there are any that fill me with confidence

she knows that we are soft and if she was prosecuted successfully she would get a very light sentence of which she would only serve half and then she would be allowed out and no doubt get a council house and be entitled to all sorts of benefits without having contributed anything. Knowing the...

why

failing Grayling as well sorry fingers jumped in before reading your post

that's assuming they get re elected. They may split the vote and cause an unwanted result

the tone of some posts about this person seem to be symptomatic of Britain today.. Nobody is responsible for what they do . It is always someone else's fault. And nothing that you choose to do should carry any consequences. There is no wonder the country is turning into a cesspit

she obviously knows how soft our justice system is and will expect a very short sentence of which she will only serve half. Then she will come out go on benefits even though she has contributed nothing. Be pushed up the housing list in front of people working and paying taxes. I think I can see...

and there are a large amount of people in this country wanting to give the vote to 16 year olds. Probably a lot will be saying that at 15 she didn't know what she was doing??