That's the reality of these modern trucks, that zone is completely blind. Even if the driver stops, gets out and looks, he then has to get back in and is once again blind to that area and anything entering it.
How can something unavoidable be criminally stupid?
.
I've never said nothing can be done about it, only that trucks that have to fully access any construction sites are restricted in what they can have as provisions. I've said they cannot have low forward cabs, they cannot have low enough side guard fences and they have to have short overhangs, all for ground clearance reasons. In consequence their drivers have some serious visibility issues just ahead of and on the left front of the cab.My view has always been that cabs should have better visibility and you have argued against that in the past. In effect saying that things are as they are and nothing can be done about it.
In some ways we are, for example in London British born white people are also a minority now. Otherwise such differences are often due to our conditions being very different from those in much of the country.Well why not, they think they are different to the rest of us.
Sorry to disappoint! I got that the point you made was to some extent meant to be provocative, but it contained too much truth for me to be upset by it.Oh flecc, I was expecting an outburst.
There are technical fixes for all those things if the will is there to do it, and if governments are prepared to force changes in design on wagons which operate in cities. I had a Citroen over forty years ago which had adjustable ride height, and at maximum it looked like it was on stilts. So something along those lines is technically possible combined with low cabs and flexible or retracting side guards.I've never said nothing can be done about it, only that trucks that have to fully access any construction sites are restricted in what they can have as provisions. I've said they cannot have low forward cabs, they cannot have low enough side guard fences and they have to have short overhangs, all for ground clearance reasons. In consequence their drivers have some serious visibility issues just ahead of and on the left front of the cab.
And it's primarily these trucks that are involved in the accidents, not only in London but mainly there due to the high level of major construction work going on.
Many of the trucks operating in London have had safety measures added but they can't always work. For example they now commonly have warning sounds or spoken messages when preparing to turn left, but in this case a motorcyclist was involved. They wear crash helmets and commonly have ear plugs in as well for good reason, and that will clearly impair their ability to hear such a warning.
An all-round camera system like that mfj197 suggests could be the best way forward and systems are being tried, though how one could be installed and kept working adequately on a tipper truck working in dirty conditions is questionable at least.
.
Ain't that the truth!the truth is that government would prefer to let them kill a few cyclists and pedestrians every year rather than force them to spend a lot of money updating their equipment.
Everyone pays lip service to the maxim that you can’t put a price on human life, but actuaries do it all the time, and in practice it really isn’t very much compared to the interests of large business and their friends in government.
A lot of truth in all this John, but it has to be said that the measures already taken over the last four years have worked as far as the 80% of male cyclists are concerned.There are technical fixes for all those things if the will is there to do it, and if governments are prepared to force changes in design on wagons which operate in cities. I had a Citroen over forty years ago which had adjustable ride height, and at maximum it looked like it was on stilts. So something along those lines is technically possible combined with low cabs and flexible or retracting side guards.
The industry would hate it and lobby against it; and the truth is that government would prefer to let them kill a few cyclists and pedestrians every year rather than force them to spend a lot of money updating their equipment.
Everyone pays lip service to the maxim that you can’t put a price on human life, but actuaries do it all the time, and in practice it really isn’t very much compared to the interests of large business and their friends in government.
And it's even worse for cyclists since the area under the left side mirrors joining both front zones is also blind to the driver.The people inside the yellow lines canot be seen by the driver!!!
But again completely impractical Bob. As I've explained earlier in the thread, London has been continuously full of very large construction projects engaging huge numbers of large construction trucks, commonly four axle 30 tonners. They've been shifting huge volumes of spoil from all the large tunnelling projects like the Ring Water Main, the trans-London Crossrail and the Thames Tideway tunnel preparatory works, plus many construction sites..I would be restricting large vehicles (over 7.5 tonnes) to hubs at the edge of towns/cities and then move goods in smaller vehicles to the retailers. Larger vehicles can be escorted with a speed restriction maybe 15 mph.