Hi Topographer, in principal I agree with you, however it's always good to get advice from the people who use the bikes. I have had some very innovative ideas and concepts presented by the Pedelecs community in the past. The skill I suppose is picking out the wheat from the chaff.I'm gonna disagree with a bunch of people on here and say that I think fat downtubes are clumsy looking. The downtube on your new MTB designs are very nice in my opinion, even with the battery bulge. But how are you supposed to please everyone? Whoever came up with the new MTB design is obviously a good designer. Maybe you should just trust him or her and let them do their thing. Asking us twerps on here is OK as long as you don't take us too seriously. I've even come across a business theory that says asking existing customers what they want is harmful to you because they always say they want faster horses rather than cars. It's your job to lead us toward new innovations because we are near-sighted.
I am with you on the fat down tube design, hence positing the concept drg. of the proposed new Wisper Torque. I still dislike the huge lump of motor placed around the BB, however the more people are getting used to the idea that an ebike does not look the same as an ordinary bicycle the less it matters, this may turn out to be the same for fat down tubes. I have had a sample of the Wisper Torque City and Trekking bike shown in an earlier post built using 3D printing, it may look better in 3 dimensions. The design certainly is not set in stone. I am leaning more towards the standard down tube battery with an enclosure, to protect and disguise the look of the battery.
All the best, David
Last edited: