Winnats Pass.

Mar 9, 2016
833
402
Never actually pedalled up Winnats , normally stick to off road but thought I,d give bike and me a try at it.
Parked first spot by bottom T junction, assumed section starts here.?
Blew tyres up to 45, normally run 30 .
Battery on 100%.
First Run
Didn't really know what to expect so put bike in high and set off conserving energy for steep section near top.
Didn't use small ring or first gear.
Distance to T junction at top
1.2 miles.( Must be a bit more, round trip is 2.5)
Average speed 7.5 mph.
Max speed 14.2 mph
Time around 8 mins.(just from watch) Might be out but figures good.
Battery used 12%.
Run2
Went for it a bit more as knew what to expect but lowered to standard from high.
Average speed 8.2 mph
Max 14.8 mph.
Kept cadence around 70.
Did use first but not small ring.
Battery....12% again..

Went around Mam Tor / Edale etc..back to Castleton back up to Winnats.
Decided if I had over 20% on battery at car, I,d do Winnats again.
Had 26%.
So
Run 3
Went at it like I was knackered, because I was.
Cadence dropped to around 50, kept a lowish gear even on approach.Left bike in standard.
Average speed 5.2.
Max 11 2.
Battery usage...12% again....
Time ten minutes plus ???
But it wasn't really a struggle.
20 years ir so ago I could have cycled up Winnats without electricity. No chance now.
 

Artstu

Esteemed Pedelecer
Aug 2, 2009
2,420
925
Hopefully you can upload your GPS data of the ride to Strava.
 
Mar 9, 2016
833
402
Didn't take GPS...even if I did wouldn't be uploading. .
If you don't believe figures meet me there....not difficult to do again...

And don't forget I could not dream of cycling up there without battery, seem to remember your post about going up there easy without one ???
Could see if that's still case ???
 

JuicyBike

Trade Member
Jan 26, 2009
1,671
527
Derbyshire
Winnats is lovely, especially from a hang glider above - I used to fly there regularly, pre-menieres.
We have a customer in his eighties, a lifelong keen cyclist whose very first ride out on one of our early Sports was up Winnats (and beyond).
He came back to our shop in Buxton to tell us all about it - he was so thrilled as it used to be along his favorite route, understandably (quite beautiful).
 
Mar 9, 2016
833
402
On the battery usage..only a rough estimate but
Used 13% on fastest time which as it turns out was exactly 10 mins.
13% of 400 is 52..( its a 400wh battery)
So usage was 6 x 52...giving 312 My highest figure..
I know this is not absolutely spot on but as a guide means I averaged 312 w or there abouts .
(ie had I kept up same rate would have used 312 wh in the hour, so in theory battery could have maintained this for 400/312 hrs. That works out as 1hr 17 mins.
Bike should be capable of 8 trips up Winnats, last one would be a struggle..(16 wh short ??)

Surprisingly hardly any difference in current used on any runs, suppose going slower, lower current but longer time...

Next time try and get time down...!!??
At moment 3 plus minutes off non assisted record..?? ( Not mine !!!)
 
Last edited:

trex

Esteemed Pedelecer
May 15, 2011
7,703
2,671
if you burn 52WH in 8 minutes, your motor runs at 52 * (60 / 8 ) = 390W
The average current is about 10A.
if you go up the same hill in 10 minutes instead of 8, 52 * 6 = 312W, average about 8A.
 
Mar 9, 2016
833
402
8 minutes was off my watch...if you calculate time from average speed and distance of 1.25 ( half round trip) time is exactly 10 mins..
So its /10...
So your 2 nd calc the most accurate..
I,ll take my gps next time..
In reality its at best an estimate of current usage..cant see the % used been a direct correlation...( is 13% on a fully charged exactly same as last 13% ?? Would have to be very clever sensors, not sure how it works it out either ? Presumably voltage drop ? Or could just calculate from power taken out by controller??? but if it did latter removing and refitting would confuse it, so its not that...???
 
Last edited:

trex

Esteemed Pedelecer
May 15, 2011
7,703
2,671
Base on the data from this source:

http://www.climbbybike.com/climb.asp?Col=Winnats-Pass&qryMountainID=9057

Average grade: 11.7 %

Length: 1.6 km

Height start: 205 m

Height top: 393 m

Ascent: 188 m

Maximum: 20 %


that's 100% big hubs territory.
Flud, you are at a disadvantage in the CD vs hubs debate. We debated the issue for a long time, most of 2014. Your opponents have access to custom battery packs, power meters, derestriction and throttle. If you race your bike against theirs, even if they pedal backward most of the hill, you are not going to win.
 
Last edited:
Mar 9, 2016
833
402
I,m not disputing that trex,, never did.
Could they compete with the 312w usage ??? That was my point.???

I climbed Winnats easily yesterday, albeit very slowly, ie average 5.2 mph, after 2 previous ascents of Winnats and a 22 mile round trip. All on 400wh batterry and still enough left to have a pedal around streets at home..

Are direct drive hubs more efficient ??
Could a 2 speed hub drive replicate the day out ??
Could a single ??

I agreed ages ago, yes if you have the battery capacity and a powerful hub motor the hub drive will be the best hill climber..

On limited battery ( 400 wh) and " nominal" 250w ??? Dare I say " I don't think so "..
 
Last edited:

trex

Esteemed Pedelecer
May 15, 2011
7,703
2,671
yes with your 52WH consumption. They can easily do that, especially with the XD motor.
You have to race on a hill with average gradient of over 14% to beat the XD and a strong pedaler like d8veh. Every time you change gear, you lose a bit of momentum. The problem with CD in a race is the time it takes to shift from 6 to 3 for example, you can't just do that in one push most of the time. Going up a hill like winnats with a TS bike, you can lose 10-20 seconds changing gears. That's why I said CD with a throttle in your other thread. The throttle reduces the need to change gear.
If I were to race against d8veh's XD on winnats, I'd take the woosh Krieger, set the gear to 4, yank the throttle to full and pedal. I wouldn't bother to change gear until the steep bit at the top.
 
Last edited:

trex

Esteemed Pedelecer
May 15, 2011
7,703
2,671
I wouldn't know the answer to that.
Personally, I like a CD with a hub gear like the Zephyr-CDN, 20" folder.
It's easy to take with me in the car on holiday, easy in the woods and it climbs more or less anything.
 
Mar 9, 2016
833
402
I wouldn't know the answer to that.
Personally, I like a CD with a hub gear like the Zephyr-CDN, 20" folder.
It's easy to take with me in the car on holiday, easy in the woods and it climbs more or less anything.
Yep wife has a bike with Bosch cd and 8 speed hub. Its marvellous...
Gears are better than mine...
 
  • Like
Reactions: trex
D

Deleted member 4366

Guest
Flud, I've done many measurements on many different bikes and motors in an attemp to find the ultimate efficiency. I found that as long as you have a motor that can cope with the hills that you encounter, there's little difference in efficiency. Any difference that people show on this forum can usually be attributed to their riding styles and pedal efforts. One can say that, generally, bikes with torque sensors use less battery power than when using a throttle or cadence sensor because they tend to make you pedal harder, but remember that's only a generalisation. Speed has a massive effect on battery useage. Obviously, the slower you go, the greater the ratio of pedal effort to motor effort. The type of bike also makes a massive difference. On the road, a light bike with thin forks and tyres takes much less effort to propel, whether by leg or motor. There's no way your bike would be able to match a bike like that on the road.

What I learnt is that it's absolutely meaningless to make any claims about any bike's efficiency unless you have another bike along side you with a rider of similar weight, power and fitness, or if you do the same circuit consecutively on different bikes.

Finally, though battery meters in the LCDs are getting better, they don't give anything absolute. You need a wattmeter to collect data to compare between bikes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mar 9, 2016
833
402
Fair point d8vh.

Any comparison / test should be side by side and as many things as equal as possible.
A few put my bikes abilities down to my pedaling efficiency...
I should do Winnats / Pico Neulous/ Mam Tor etc on a hub drive and make a valid comparison.
Unfortunately that's not quite realistic.
There does seem to be a fog of information surrounding ebikes and especially legal pedelecs. I do wonder if I this fog prospective buyers end up making wrong decisions about purchases..??
Trouble is buying public seem to put great store by "reviews" .
Think places like this should be place to come to objective opinion.
I,m not posting file below to prove a point but to show there is a contrasting opinion dependant on where folk read.
Wonder if background of many on here inadvertantly has an effect on replies rather than being objective..
File llifted from " ebike" info for prospective buyers. Suspect the list would be different on here..wp_ss_20160416_0001.png

Please note I,m not saying I totally agree with all that but there is a lot of contrasting opinions from even well thought of sources.
Not great for buyers..
( Its not my list , found it looking into electric motors for mountain bikes)
I said similar on here and it started rather a lot of conflict..

The list went to 12, there were advantages but these were more to do with price/ ease of fitment/ repair than actual usage..

( I ain't really bothered , seriously, but I,ve been called opinionated, told to shut up, talking crap, challenged to races and a message from mod for saying less than in.list..doesnt look good for forum and newbies posting their findings ? Not many as thick skinned as me ?)

And to be fair d8.( wish you had a name) I wasn't making any claims about my bike, I was careful not to do so. I merely reported info from day,s ride.. ( didn't say anything about bike make/type either)
Said it would be hard act to follow on current usage/ hill climb..Not really a comparison..
I also said myself the current used was likely to be inaccurate, a guide at best. The fact was a 400wh battery got me up Winnats 3 times, one at a decent time, one admittedly very slowly and bike did a further 20 miles of mixed offroad/ climbs/ bit on road and was still operating fine afterwards.( had around 15% left)
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 4366

Guest
If you put the word "some" in front of each of those statements in the list, then they become true, except statement 1. If a bike doesn't have suspension in the motor wheel. The motor makes no difference to unsprung weight. In fact a rear hub-motor could be better for some types of off-road riding. I can make an equivalent list of problems with middle motors, but there's no point. Every system has advantages and disadvantages. It's up to the user to select the system that matches his needs. Unqualified statements like that list can cause somebody to make a wrong choice. That's why I don't like them and I'll jump on anybody that makes any other unqualified statement that. Over the years, we've had it many times relating to efficiency, front motor vs back, CD vs hub, suspension vs rigid, ready-made vs kit, dealer vs online, etc, etc. It's exactly the same with politicians, they always cherry pick the data and facts to represent their cause. How can anybody choose which way to vote in the EU referendum, when all the the information is biased? Who is there that's knowledgeable in the matter and independent, who can tell us?