Use basic logic. If it had happened, it would have been all over the MSM showing the disfigurement of the unfortunate victim, but it wasn't because there was no victim.
It's the other way round - these are the people that were the source of the information and Lowles didn't admit he was wrong
Anyone can of course publish, just get yourself a website and the search engines will ferret your contents. However, Elon Musk has now waded into voicing his political views on X with dodgy contents. UK government will have to address the situation and set out clear boundaries.
I can't remember what I exactly said regarding HB's laptop. I did say that Outlook files (assuming he uses Microsoft Office) can easily be doctored with replacement or added messages, so if HB said that such email was fake, then I believe him.
I think you may be vastly overestimating the reach and the power of the uk government. In my opinion, as a world power, it is largely impotent, not that this prevents its politicians having delusions of grandeur. Musk will do and say whatever he likes. You can already see the contempt he has for our politicians.
I am aware how users can trick LLMs into telling you how to commit crimes (or jailbreaking) or to hallucinate. That does not apply to customised AI models. It's just that to avoid hallucinations, the model needs to run through more filters such as semantic entropy to detect defective replies.
He'll risk being arrested if he arrives in UK and or EU plus his companies may be fined or banned to operate here. Just look at Mark Zuckerberg. He avoids the UK because he does not want to testify in front of our parlementarian commission. We don't have the same protected speech like the US. In the US, prosecutors need to prove immediacy element of any harm caused by your speech.
Yes we can make ourselves into a repressive irrelevance by carrying on like the mullahs in Iran. The surpising thing is that you seem to approve of this.
Try yourself to make AI hallucinate, especially with claude.ai.
odysee.com
