⁰⁰
Maybe you need to watch that video again that you refer to and listen to what the presenter is saying. The whole video is totally against the conspiracy rubbish you have been quoting.
I did listen to what they are saying. I did not quote any particular source other than what the FBI chief said in congress committee hearing. The guys who made the video know a lot about guns, I know a fair bit about physics. I am consistent throughout this thread. Trump wasn't hit by a bullet. My inference is not based on any conspiracy, they are simple deductions from physics standpoint and what we know as facts.
Let me explain:
In physics, any object traversing air at high speed creates a hydraulic pressure wave along its path. If the speed is hypersonic like in this case, the wake of the pressure wave will cavitate behind the bullet which you can hear.
The energy of cavitation tears the flesh and makes the damage. His ear wasn't torn, so the small wound wasn't caused by cavitation, the travelling hydraulic shockwave wasn't hypersonic, therefore he wasn't hit by a bullet. That was my conclusion more or less immediately on the day he was shot. I didn't watch YT videos about this until the next day.