That's right..Grandiose delusions evident above I think. You also seem completely unaware of your own tendency to confirmation bias.
It isn't shallow to be wary of my own biases. You seem to systematically sift out evidence that does not support your views.
I am cautious about sources, their qualifications and credibility and try to stay on top of my tendency to grab 'evidence' which confirm my own views.
I also have a strong suspicion of internet chat about conspiracy. I think that is very well founded. Most of it - probably 99% is total rubbish.
As to the issue of the New Jersey Drones. I read an article this morning about the subject on the BBC news site. Not a source you would read I think - a problem of your own making. In it, I picked up an interesting clue. These drones have been seen around the Picatinny Arsenal, an important, top secret government research centre.....
Clue?
I think it may be.
If the US department of defence is not involved in designing and testing military drones of all kinds and seeking ways to both disrupt them and to proof them against disruption by electronic means they are asleep on the job. It just happens that they have a research centre - bang in the middle of the area where these drones are being seen.
If they were involved in drone research (which they must be) and if the drones being reported were their own, it would account for the shoulder shrugging and platitudinous remarks about the fact that the drones are harmless to the public.
They can't do it all in Area 51, it's too small?!
And there's no people to tell you if they're able to see the 'dark' drones in 'wisper' mode, or not. That's no fun, hehe
Can't tell the local authorities, coz its 'secret'? ;-)