we have a free market economy.
I wasn't primarily talking about our government, they certainly haven't done a bad job so far with supply and certainly did things it's EU counterparts didn't. They placed orders for over 400 million doses, almost a 4 fold increase over population. That certainly wasn't replicated accross EU. They funded new production facilities in Stockton and Barnard Castle almost a year before Germany did similar.
Thank you for confirming what I've long been suspecting, Zlatan and Suzan are one and the same person.
One downside of the Pfizer in UK is that there seems to be a pretty extended delay for the second jab. Several people I know are have had second AZ jabs, even though the manufacturer specified in-between time is longer. I don't know anyone who has had second Pfizer jab, even though the first was administered before several people's first AZ jab. ... We'll see how it pans out, still not nearing the governments arbitrary 12 weeks.
Hindsight is more than 20/20 in this case. And Susan and yourself are practicing it now...if indeed she is not a more thoughtful version of yourself. At every stage you choose to ignore the fact that the majority of the vaccine manufacturing in the Western world is still located within the EU. Unfortunately Not all the technology for making the piece parts is there , the USA, , China, Taiwan, Japan manufacture the chips, the micromachines, even the plastic and stainless steel tubing, the vacuum pumps, the reagents. .. And remember nobody knew which reagents would be the ones needed in the successful candidates. You cannot manufacture everything, otherwise you complete nothing. There are plenty of engineering management books on the "Learning Curve" .. perhaps you might read one.
If I was your GP I would have thrown you out of a first floor surgery window you ridiculous man. What an absolutely stupid question to be asking in the middle of a pandemic.
www.euronews.com
Zlatan's reply to Woosh who quoted a post made by Suzan:
Like Suzan mentioned, that's now happened 3 times. Was mid argument with Woosh 2 weeks ago and swapped.. (later deleted so you won't find it flecc)
Only 1 in 1500 of the 9.02 millions of our over 70s, so inconsequential.
Unless you are one of them. Death is quite a large consequence.
1 in 1500 is inconsequential since the range of things that can and do end the life of over 70s is so vast that an added one scarcely counts.
Avoiding a known possibility if one can, however miniscule the risk is, is still a sensible and rational action.
