Whilst that might work, I would advise against trying it. You are likely to experience a dangerously high level of carbon dioxide build up and / or hypoxia due to lack of oxygen. Both of these conditions can be fatal. It's your choice, but I would favour a mask over the plastic bag approach.
A wide necked inverted goldfish bowl over the head is the obvious answer, rehome the fish some where else or you risk drowning.
I adopted the look after number one approach months ago. Just keep your distance. The old advice from WHO remains as valid today as seven months ago. Keep your distance. In the open air , a 2 metre distance is more effective than close proximity with any mask(excluding a mechanical pump driven filter as in HAZMAT). 3 and 4 metre even better. However you are falling into the same fallacy as the Mail. The purpose of the mask in protecting others is not its filtering properties, desirable as they might be, but its ability to reduce expelled air velocity and direct it earthwards. So that type of mask, with the valve directed downwards ..as they are are much better than those acrylic curvilinear face shields.
The Mail’s article was about how much moisture, bacteria & virus face masks catch before it finds its way from mouth / nose and into the atmosphere. I am more interested in what is most effective at catching airborne virus particles going the other way, for those occasions when close proximity is unavoidable.
I hope they stick to that policy. It will be very unpopular, but it needs to be enforced, especially if parents take children abroad and end up quarantined and consequently out of school.
Maybe not in newspaper articles, but the ability of masks and face covering has been extensively covered in scientific experiments.
It's just been announced that with the return to full time education, London's buses and tube trains have been increased. The Victoria line is back up to a tube train every 100 seconds at busy times.
Oh I dont know. School taught me very little, and the controlling aspect of it hindered rather than helped me in life. Until one reach post grad I'd say education is highly overrated. In fact everything up to that point seem an often elaborate miguided wasteful excuse for just getting there.
I always like to say ... I went to school to play and came home to learn ... I learned more at home than anything in a school and look at me now, a total idiot !
But that is true, I learned more from my first five years working than in my entire formal education
I enjoyed school and university. I got a lot out of both. Fantastic experience not to be squandered. I definitely support the fines and think they should go even further with exclusion from school until paid.
that may be because you did put real work into your first job and not in the years you spent at school and uni!
Do you think though that your formal education enabled you to learn so much in your first five years of work. Perhaps without that education you would not have been able to learn so much.
After the much-commented Seaborne Freight so beloved of Grayling?
