Why are you here? It seems that the answer is that which I deduced in my previous post.And again - by your own definition you're off-topic. You really can't help yourself can you?
Tom
Why are you here? It seems that the answer is that which I deduced in my previous post.And again - by your own definition you're off-topic. You really can't help yourself can you?
Personally I don't have a problem with 'trolls'. Because who is to decide who is the 'troll'? I'm all for complete free speech. Say what you like. In any way you like it. If people like what you're saying they'll respond - if not you'll get ignored. If ALL you ever do is troll then sooner or later people just ignore you because you're boring them.Actually yours.
I ve been saying for months you and Tom have done nothing but insult, patronise and put down. Many others now saying same but you just dismiss them in same manner. You and Tom are the Troll's. Fact.
You rarely post without some insult or put down.
I'll try and steer you back in the right Direction.. the Thread is about Brexit, so far you have posted noting significant on the subject.And again - by your own definition you're off-topic. You really can't help yourself can you?
Click Bait againPersonally I don't have a problem with 'trolls'. Because who is to decide who is the 'troll'? I'm all for complete free speech. Say what you like. In any way you like it. If people like what you're saying they'll respond - if not you'll get ignored. If ALL you ever do is troll then sooner or later people just ignore you because you're boring them.
If it is I'm doing a bloody good job because you keep falling for it!Click Bait again
I see something wrong with any poster who does nothing other than contribute off-topic nonsense to a thread; like you!Personally I see nothing wrong with going 'off-topic' a bit. It adds flavour and spice and makes a thread more interesting.
Good post. At least you and I can see we all do it.Confirmation bias it is called in psychological circles. It's where you pick the facts to support whatever argument/position you're taking.
Like flat-earth believers (they actually exist) - can support their argument with 'facts'. We all do it. Why? Because there are too many 'facts' to consider and we're never sure which ones are true.
So we tend towards instinctively picking a position on a subject (eg Brexit) - and from then on we cherry pick the facts to suit that position.
Watch Prime-ministers QT anytime you like - politicians are masters at this.
But you have done it to tune of 2000 posts.I see something wrong with any poster who does nothing other than contribute off-topic nonsense to a thread; like you!
If you have nothing positive to offer, perhaps because you know that 'Brexit' will be disastrous for the British people, why don't you just say nothing?
Tom
Your conclusion works for me!I can only conclude that she is one of those people who derives sexual gratification from humiliation. There can be no other plausible explanation for her behaviour.
it seems that boundaries have been pushed back in this thread.Say what you like. In any way you like it.
Funny, I always imagined her to have a secret closet at N°10 filled with latex and whips etc...Well, she has returned from Europe with the metaphorical tattoos on the cheeks of her arse that I mentioned a while back (Farage & Rees Mogg) I can only conclude that she is one of those people who derives sexual gratification from humiliation. There can be no other plausible explanation for her behaviour.
Your thoughts are now going to haunt me forever. Thanks for that!Funny, I always imagined her to have a secret closet at N°10 filled with latex and whips etc...
Have you and the other participant in this name calling and point scoring competition have any idea how tedious it is?.My post was not 'intended to disrupt the debate' - it was intended to point out to you that you chastise people for doing something you do yourself.
Personally I see nothing wrong with going 'off-topic' a bit. It adds flavour and spice and makes a thread more interesting.
But if you're going to give other people a hard time for doing it - then set an example and don't do it yourself.
You could start by ignoring this post.
But it's Boris's job to support his party in government, it's JC's job to disrupt where he opposes.On a lighter note The Economist has just held their worst politician article..
There were just too many to chose from with Vince Cable, TM, David Cameron, Liam Fox, David Davies all good runners but there were 2 stand out candidates... Boris and dear old JC.. Boris got the accolades, just.
Trying to get somewhat back on at least one of our topics, is latex not the major consitutant of the "no more leaks " bicycle tube sealants?Funny, I always imagined her to have a secret closet at N°10 filled with latex and whips etc...