Certainly I accept democratic results which normally require a much bigger margin than 4% in a referendum especially one that is for guidance only... sorry but I again must disagree. Is this not a case of " all out of step except my Johnny".
If you accept democratic principles, then you must accept the results, however unpalatable. Democracy has a number of checks and balances, .. the courts to prevent mob rule by being independent arbitrators of existing law, the police to ensure compliance with the rule of law, the parliament to create the rule of law and to hold the executive to account. The executive government (ministers) to suggest policy and to run the civil service.
It was / is the failure of parliament in its role of defender of the common good which is most at fault in my opinion. They had a long time to reflect on the likely outcomes before making their determination.
I am not absolving the general public of their responsibility to be informed, but the major failing remains that of the elected representatives, who had by their oaths of office the greater responsibility. Carrying out your analogy, which I dislike, the monkeys were going to get the same amount of nuts irrespective of which way they voted, as the referendum was ambiguous with such a small margin.
We have been railroaded into this situation
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk