EU trade accounts for about 12% of our GDP. Moving to WTO will reduce it but not stop it. So you can remove anything higher than possibly 5%. The trade will bounce back as soon as we conclude an FTA with the EU.As as been said a number of times Brexit has not yet happened. So I am not going to speculate, what if it is 10% or 20% not 2% of a reduction. ? As I write this I am listening to a speech by Mr Barnier, to our irish parliament, and he is well informed about our local requirements. He has more detail than any of bland assertions from Westminster
No, because a labour government would adopt the EU directives.. surely even you can figure that out?Good post.
My feeling is a change if government to a more socially minded one is more a priority than staying or leaving EU.
Our current Tory's can do as they please with scant regard to challenge from opposition. That's doing the damage. A strong Labour would hold government in check far than EU ever could.???
No, it shows what the people wielding influence over a gullible public wantThe fact Corbyn gains so little support simply shows his policies/ statements are not what country want.
Because the Blithering idiot didn't oppose Brexit.OG
I recall you saying you would vote lib Dem, I,d guess in past you were a labour voter ? If so, what's your reasoning behind not supporting Corbyn ? Have you been indoctrinated by right wing press??
And where's the problem in that ?The Mirror has this
"
Labour manifesto leaked: Jeremy Corbyn pledges to re-nationalise energy industry, railways and Royal Mail in draft document
The 43-page draft contains landmark promises on the NHS, social care, education and housing
Interestingly the paper is Positive about the Manifesto rather than the usual reaction.
What is going on, I wonder?
Needless to say the Right wing rags are not.
No, because a labour government would adopt the EU directives.. surely even you can figure that out?
Be so good as to point to the post where you made that statement, the last ones I saw said quite the oppositeAnd where's the problem in that ?
Seems strange you arguing against this post when I,m saying I,d sooner ys be in Europe with Labour than out with Tories...but then again you,d argue against my post if I said night follows day..
So you,re not voting Labour because of Blair, which I said was case for many voters about 30 pages back...and in other words you,re not voting labour has nothing at all to do with right wing press, again something I said was case for many pages and ages ago.Because the Blithering idiot didn't oppose Brexit.
Do you really imagine the right wing press is any more likely to influence me than you are?
And for the record I haven't voted since Blair first appeared on the scene and the Labour party vanished.
You are confused aren't you? Blair was and is a Right wing politician that's why he has got away with what he did so far!So you,re not voting Labour because of Blair, which I said was case for many voters about 30 pages back...and in other words you,re not voting labour has nothing at all to do with right wing press, again something I said was case for many pages and ages ago.
You and I are perfect examples of why labour is failing and nothing at all to do with right wing press.
Yes the relentless pushing and bile they push out might con a few but I still believe Blair , ( the Iraq war) and Corbyn combined lose far more than right wing press. And BTW the lack of reporting on Kelly case, the gentle approach to Blair are hardly signs of allways supporting the right.
Don't you think Blair's shot accross his bows recently was rather orchestrated at a convenient time ??? Sort of shut up or we might prosecute ??
Except you I presume...you are more enlightened than public...but still wont be voting for Corbyn...for different reasons..ahemm...ofcourse.No, it shows what the people wielding influence over a gullible public want
No he was a left wing politician with right wing policies. He got into power under and through the labour movement. I believe the term was Tory light. ( or is it Lite with his American counterparts)You are confused aren't you? Blair was and is a Right wing politician that's why he has got away with what he did so far!
Have you looked in a mirror recently, if you do you will see someone who ctiticises everone else for his own failings!Except you I presume...you are more enlightened than public...but still wont be voting for Corbyn...for different reasons..ahemm...ofcourse.
New Labour as a principle ruined labour, he was simply the RingleaderNo he was a left wing politician with right wing policies. He got into power under and through the labour movement. I believe the term was Tory light. ( or is it Lite with his American counterparts)
But whichever way you call it his legacy had ruined labour..( or started decline)
OG, I don't think the phrase, 'Sometimes it's better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and prove it!' has made its way as far as Trollville yet.Be so good as to point to the post where you made that statement, the last ones I saw said quite the opposite
"My feeling is a change if government to a more socially minded one is more a priority than staying or leaving EU.
Where did you actually make the statement
"when I,m saying I,d sooner ys be in Europe with Labour than out with Tories.."
Quote the post where it appeared
You didn't make that statement did you ?
Of course we would, everyone knows day follows night.you,d argue against my post if I said night follows day..
Oh, he will be alright when the day finally dawns when he decides which side he's on, manages not to get confused for the entire 24 hours as to what the particular side stands for, what it should and can do, and is to be blamed for doing/ and or not doing ,and how it ought to go about changing the world , and be elected and organised.OG, I don't think the phrase, 'Sometimes it's better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and prove it!' has made its way as far as Trollville yet.
Also, you mustn't be too unkind when someone embarks on a battle of wits when only half-prepared.
Tom
You are being far too deep for him there flecc, shame on you.Of course we would, everyone knows day follows night.
.
Yes, I agree totally..and no I do not think the general public are any more or less enlightened than you or I, but neither of us will be voting Labour ( I think, manifesto might hold out some hope) and neither of us are influenced by right wing press.New Labour as a principle ruined labour, he was simply the Ringleader