I don't know what the EU has in mind and to be fair neither do you.
To get 27 country's to agree will take some doing.
To get 27 country's to agree will take some doing.
They want to take us to the cleaners.In truth they are trying to help us, they aren't at war with us or threatening or blackmailing us.
So EU membership does not protect our employment T&Cs from attack.But not because of the EU, solely due to UK governments rulings, further illustrating my point above that our government takes less care of us than the EU.
.
No. But it could have done if we'd been more co-operative with their joint venture.So EU membership does not protect our employment T&Cs from attack.
I don't think we want any of the benefits.hat's a lesson Theresa May needs to learn, she seems to imagine we can have the benefits of club membership while not being a member and paying the dues. Barmy.
That would be taking ourselves to the cleaners. It wouldn't be very long before all our car manufacturing disappeared into the Eastern bloc, and France with its high unemployment would welcome back our part of Airbus structural production.They want to take us to the cleaners.
We should just walk away.
As I've pointed out before, that means one of two options.The more I think about it, the more I think we should just walk away and look for business elsewhere.
Come of it tillson that has nothing whatever to do with the EU and everything to do with local Government, the EU does not dictate pensions to any countryAll of the things you mention above are good. I have no argument with that, particularly the age of retirement in France. However, the UK's retirement age has gone the other way. It was 60 for women and 65 for men, now that's 65, 66, 67 ..... and increasing. All this has happened since we have been members of the EU.
We have never been Married to the EU so where have you dreamed up this nonsense from?When I split up with the Ex Wife she told me she would make it as difficult as
possible for me (Kids,CSA.etc) Does anybody think this made me want to go
back to her ?
And it's similar for all other benefits, we are way below our neighbouring EU countries.
The only country we beat is Mexico
Really? then how do you explain the existence of the EU?I don't know what the EU has in mind and to be fair neither do you.
To get 27 country's to agree will take some doing.
I don't think falling back to WTO is going to be as problematic as giving to EU's demands and continue to be bullied for the foreseeable future.As I've pointed out before, that means one of two options.
1) Matching Chinese prices.
or
2) Gaining the ability to outsell the Germans and Swiss on quality.
The first would mean a fall to very low living standards, the second maybe impossible without a complete change in national character.
.
All this talk of a 100 billion pound "divorce" must have got me confusedWe have never been Married to the EU so where have you dreamed up this nonsense from?
The EU isn't making any demands is it? it has issued a statement outlining general principles and these have been spun into demands by the media for consumption by those in this country susceptible to that sort of thing with the hope of keeping them on side, so that they don't blame the Government when it fails miserably to get "A good deal"I don't think falling back to WTO is going to be as problematic as giving to EU's demands.
Take the car sector.
We buy more than 2.69 million cars last year. Most have to be made here so falling back to WTO does not mean massive job losses in car building.
That is precisely what it is intended to do, the figure has been exaggerated for effect by the FT journalists, another £350 million pounds on the side of a Bus sloganAll this talk of a 100 billion pound "divorce" must have got me confused
we will soon see how far and how much the EU wants to load the divorce bill.The EU isn't making any demands is it? it has issued a statement outlining general principles and these have been spun into demands by the media for consumption by those in this country susceptible to that sort of thing with the hope of keeping them on side, so that they don't blame the Government when it fails miserably to get "A good deal"
And let's be brutally honest, who believes the Government actaully wants a deal that is good for the country rather than one that is good for it's Paymasters?
Once again I ask you another question: Do you believe the Government actually wants a "Good Deal" that benefits not just the Elite, but the rest of us?
And if they are made here how will that help pay the bills re the loss of Exports?I don't think falling back to WTO is going to be as problematic as giving to EU's demands and continue to be bullied for the foreseeable future.
Take the car sector.
We buy more than 2.69 million cars last year. Most have to be made here after brexit so falling back to WTO does not mean massive job losses in car building.
It's not that simple. Many aren't made here at all, just assembled here from parts imported from various parts of the world. Others are only partly made here, and a very high proportion of the cars we buy are made elsewhere, such as Germany, Spain, Italy, Japan and the Eastern bloc EU countries.Take the car sector.
We buy more than 2.69 million cars last year. Most have to be made here after brexit so falling back to WTO does not mean massive job losses in car building.
Divorce Bill belongs with Firm and Stable Government try agreed Outstanding bills to be more accuratewe will soon see how far and how much the EU wants to load the divorce bill.
I have less and less faith in the EU wanting an FTA with us.
I think the estimate for a hit on GDP if we fall back to WTO is a 2% drop in GDP that will eventually be recovered in a few years (less than 10).It's not that simple. Many aren't made here at all, just assembled here from parts imported from various parts of the world. Others are only partly made here, and a very high proportion of the cars we buy are made elsewhere, such as Germany, Spain, Italy, Japan and the Eastern bloc EU countries.
Tariffs will have complex and often multiple outcomes, not least of all the bureaucratic complexity and costs.
.