How can you miss the point so comprehensively?
*
Clearly I vote for the lesser by far of the two evils.
A council with a proven record that doesn't actually harm, rather than one that has totally failed at huge ongoing cost to everyone in the borough and even a cost to the whole country, including you.
* It's a rhetorical question, I know how. You are so bigotted against anything Tory that you are unable to understand that Tory principles, when strictly limited in powers as in a local authority and thus controlled, can be the better.
For example, the council of the London Borough of Wandsworth has long been recognised as being one of the most efficient in the country with consistently low council tax yet satisfying their residents better than most. The majority of their 20 wards are working class, yet they have voted in a Tory council continuously ever since 1978. But at Greater London Council level they have only a Labour councillor representing Wandsworth, in both cases "horses for courses", the wise person's choice.
Meanwhile my own London borough's Labour Council, in addition to the evils I mentioned, have also shut down the meals on wheels service, leaving hundreds of the elderly stranded and isolated.
But Wandsworth not only have their meals on wheels service, they also run an "Extra Help" scheme for those in need:
Extra Help Wandsworth can help with:
- Companionship
- Escort to appointments or social activities & events
- Cleaning and tidying
- Laundry and ironing
- Shopping errands
- Meal preparation
- Parent's help
- Gardening and DIY
- Dog walking
Who would you vote for, our Croydon bankrupt, expensive and useless Labour Council or Wandsworth's low cost, high performing Tory one?
.