Brexit, for once some facts.

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,152
30,567
France started the evacuation since 10th of May, using regular commercial flights.
Spain completed it's withdrawal of nearly 30,000 troops on 29th October 2015!

By public demand when their electorate voted in a PM who promised to withdraw them.
.
 

jonathan.agnew

Esteemed Pedelecer
Dec 27, 2018
2,400
3,381
A very silly claim for Boris to make anyway. There was nothing the Foreign Office could have done. The Taliban had total mastery of the situation so were calling all the shots.
.
It's a bit of an enigma to me. As egypt and al-Sisi (instead of morsi) show public opinion has nothing on us dollars and strategic interest. Usually. Surely Afghanistan was of strategic interest. And ghost afghan soldiers and police and endemic corruption (which is standard fare anywhere in third world) aside, technology usually win wars these days, even asymmetric ones (as in syria), not a lot an rpg can do to to t90s with reactive armour (and unlike iraq the place weren't littered with us howitzer shells for ied's).
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,152
30,567
It's a bit of an enigma to me. As egypt and al-Sisi (instead of morsi) show public opinion has nothing on us dollars and strategic interest. Usually. Surely Afghanistan was of strategic interest. And ghost afghan soldiers and police and endemic corruption (which is standard fare anywhere in third world) aside, technology usually win wars these days, even asymmetric ones (as in syria), not a lot an rpg can do to to t90s with reactive armour (and unlike iraq the place weren't littered with us howitzer shells for ied's).
The answer is that technology doesn't win that kind of war and never can or will. The Russians found that out the hard way and withdrew from Afghanistan in early 1989 after finding it impossible to beat the Mujahideen. The USA found that out in Vietnam when they fled in fear of their lives from Saigon. Earlier too in Korea.

These are enemies who appear out of nowhere, attack and disappear into nowhere, as often as not because they are supported by the population who are a part of the enemy while often pretending to be allies. That makes it possible for them to attack from behind the lines with planted bombs, IEDs and suicide bombers. Thats why the Taliban took over so quickly, contrary to our lies they didn't have to fight, the Afghan army merely stood aside for them since they didn't believe in what they were defending, many of them believing in the Taliban and some even a part of the Taliban.

As for the strategic importance, there is none now since Afghanistan has become effectively a neutral between the two sides now that both Russia and the USA have been driven out and neither will want to return.

Now for both sides it will be about aid and diplomacy.
.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: oldgroaner

Danidl

Esteemed Pedelecer
Sep 29, 2016
8,611
12,256
73
Ireland
The answer is that technology doesn't win that kind of war and never can or will. The Russians found that out the hard way and withdrew from Afghanistan in early 1989 after finding it impossible to beat the Mujahideen. The USA found that out in Vietnam when they fled in fear of their lives from Saigon. Earlier too in Korea.

These are enemies who appear out of nowhere, attack and disappear into nowhere, as often as not because they are supported by the population who are a part of the enemy while often pretending to be allies. That makes it possible for them to attack from behind the lines with planted bombs, IEDs and suicide bombers. Thats why the Taliban took over so quickly, contrary to our lies they didn't have to fight, the Afghan army merely stood aside for them since they didn't believe in what they were defending, many of them believing in the Taliban and some even a part of the Taliban.

As for the strategic importance, there is none now since Afghanistan has become effectively a neutral between the two sides now that both Russia and the USA have been driven out and neither will want to return.

Now for both sides it will be about aid and diplomacy.
.
Don't forget China in that equation. Afghanistan has a pivotal point, between Russian interests, Chinese, Western .. India and Pakistan, and the Oil rich Gulf . If ever there was a need to have another neutral Switzerland ,it is there.
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,152
30,567
Don't forget China in that equation. Afghanistan has a pivotal point, between Russian interests, Chinese, Western .. India and Pakistan, and the Oil rich Gulf . If ever there was a need to have another neutral Switzerland ,it is there.
Agreed and it's what I meant about the two sides, now China and Russia are increasingly aligned, also saying Afghanistan was effectively a neutral now.

But a neutral like Switzerland is a long way off I fear. More a country which hates everyone. The USA, Russia and China have spoiled their chances in many ways, the USA and Russia by their very long military actions in Afghanistan, Russia and China by their their treatment of their Chechen and Uighur Islamic minorities.

It will be very difficult for any country to win hearts and minds in Afghanistan.
.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: oldgroaner

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
Going back to the Brexit thing, The Daily fail is obviously unaware that we were offered what they now want and turned it down!
 
  • Like
Reactions: oyster

oyster

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 7, 2017
10,422
14,609
West West Wales
Florida radio host who called himself ‘Mr Anti-Vax’ dies of Covid-19
They are all checking out:

Texas man who led anti-mask protests in name of ‘freedom’ dies of Covid-19
Jessica Wallace told the newspaper her husband began experiencing Covid symptoms on 26 July but refused to get tested or go to the hospital. He instead took high doses of Vitamin C, zinc aspirin and ivermectin, an anti-parasitic medicine used for livestock that officials have urged people not to take for Covid-19.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/29/texas-caleb-wallace-anti-mask-protests-freedom-dies-covid-19
 
  • Informative
Reactions: oldgroaner

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
American aid to Afghanistan
If my Father was still alive he would have found this to be unbelievable
at Dunkirk they destroyed everything the Germans could use even when under heavy attack.
Are we to assume that all of this ordnance was in use by the Afghan defence forces?
And did the US remove it's hardware?
Didn't the Americans have the nouse to plant demolition charges in the weapons dumps that they could trigger if things went belly up?
And the icing on the cake
33 Mi Russian Helicopter Gunships the Russians will be happy to help with.
 

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
The Noble art of double speak
"“NHS guidance demonstrates that the global supply crunch affecting everything from manufacturing to food has found its way to the healthcare sector. However, there are no reports of similar shortages outside the UK”

That is the best description of "Global Britain" yet!
Only exceptionally well organised gibbering idiots could achieve
us becoming the first to achieve a "Global supply crunch"
Confined to ourselves:rolleyes:

Putin loves you.
Have this photograph of some Roubles and there's more where they came from
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,152
30,567
Israel seems to be struggling with Covid
Confirms what I've been saying ever since the pandemic began. It doesn't matter how well it's handled, at the outset or later, it will still catch up with everyone eventually if they don't have near perfect isolation. Policies can make it worse as we've done, almost no policy makes it better.

I first said that about the UK with it's big regional differences last year, but since then it's become true all around the world

All those countries who were being praised for how well they were doing at the outset have suffered big setbacks since. And now Israel has shown what I said about the ineffectiveness of the vaccines against infection, since nowhere has been more thorough with vaccinating everyone than they were.
.
 
Last edited:

Danidl

Esteemed Pedelecer
Sep 29, 2016
8,611
12,256
73
Ireland
If my Father was still alive he would have found this to be unbelievable
at Dunkirk they destroyed everything the Germans could use even when under heavy attack.
Are we to assume that all of this ordnance was in use by the Afghan defence forces?
And did the US remove it's hardware?
Didn't the Americans have the nouse to plant demolition charges in the weapons dumps that they could trigger if things went belly up?
And the icing on the cake
33 Mi Russian Helicopter Gunships the Russians will be happy to help with.
I understand that these are the arsenal they provided the Afghan national army with. Now there will no doubt be plenty of ammunition to service these weapons. Moreover the Afghan Army is now a well trained army, and will obviously become the bulk of the new Taliban controlled National Army. They will have maintenance skills and workshops to keep those Blackhawks airborne, and that gives them a potent regional army.
 

Nev

Esteemed Pedelecer
May 1, 2018
1,507
2,520
North Wales
  • Like
Reactions: oyster

Advertisers