This is meant in jest...
But it let's you get away with everything else?
Come on give us a smile
Ok I will try my first emoticon
This is meant in jest...
But it let's you get away with everything else?
Come on give us a smile
They're in a trap. Labour MPs are almost entirely against leaving the EU, but know that the great majority of those who elected them are for leaving.As an outsider, I have been bewildered by the lackluster response from Labour.
Promises, promises.....or is it a stealth one?Ok I will try my first emoticon
.......Don't work for meOk I will try my first emoticon
1. The court said, the government couldn't change the law based on the referendum, the law can only be changed by parliament. So that does mean that the referendum has no legal standing. The law can only be changed by parliament.Just two points
1. The supreme court ruling was on the legality of parliament having the final say rather than the executive , and they were not ruling on the advisory nature of the referendum.
2. Since the public opinion is basically evenly split, they can safely make up their own minds as they will find equal amounts of approval and approbation
The turn to Murdoch to be told what to do as usual, surely?1. The court said, the government couldn't change the law based on the referendum, the law can only be changed by parliament. So that does mean that the referendum has no legal standing. The law can only be changed by parliament.
2. Yes the referendum showed a pretty much 50/50 split. So it goes back the MPs to make up their own mind. Even in the Conservative cabinent 70% of them were pro remain.
They are very interesting times indeed.
Do they vote with what they believe and what the experts are telling them, or go with the "will of the people" which can and will always change with time.
How odd, if you click at the end of the text and then on the emoticon symbol at the left of the lower upper menu bar, the available emoticons should appear at the bottom of your post, then all you have to do is click on one.......Don't work for. Me
They should vote for what their conservative majority electorate wanted, since they won the general election. So since the clear majority of the conservative voting electorate wanted to remain and the MPs and cabinet want to as well, there is no problem, don't trigger article 50, scrapping Brexit.in the Conservative cabinent 70% of them were pro remain.
Do they vote with what they believe and what the experts are telling them, or go with the "will of the people"
If they vote like last time, they will vote overwhelmingly for A50, in a way, a win for democracy.Do they vote with what they believe and what the experts are telling them, or go with the "will of the people" which can and will always change with time.
D:OHow odd, if you click at the end of the text and then on the emoticon symbol at the left of the lower upper menu bar, the available emoticons should appear at the bottom of your post, then all you have to do is click on one
Then hit "Post Reply"
Is this how you were doing it?
I really don't want to be rude but you are posting increasingly nonsensical rubbish now. Clearly, you don't seem to appreciate that 27 other sovereign states understand that being members of such a large collective body with fantastic barrier-free trading and transparent democracy is a worthwhile thing.I don't think the issue of nationality is non-sense at all. Half of the UK want victory at all costs, to quote Churchill: "Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival."
If you keep talking about the economy, you are not going to change their mind. If less than 1 out of 10 brexit voters change their mind, you are not going to reverse brexit.
Perhaps you meant 'opprobrium' rather than approbation 'Danidl'?Since the public opinion is basically evenly split, they can safely make up their own minds as they will find equal amounts of approval and approbation
Let's leave the insults aside, oldtom.I really don't want to be rude but you are posting increasingly nonsensical rubbish now. Clearly, you don't seem to appreciate that 27 other sovereign states understand that being members of such a large collective body with fantastic barrier-free trading and transparent democracy is a worthwhile thing.
It is only the British, or to be precise, the English & Welsh part of the UK which wants to divorce the country from the EU. Of course, there are some individuals in many of the other 27 states who share the view that they would prefer to be outside of the EU - that could be hundreds, thousands or even a few million of their populations - but they are not prepared to cut off their nose, as it were, to spite their face. They know which side their bread is buttered on and that is why they are not demonstrating in the streets of their capital cities screaming for what we call 'Brexit'.
Why do you quote Churchill? He was simply a figurehead the nation clung to through WW2 and wasn't much of a people's politician in peacetime. Perhaps you are one of those who thinks Britain needs to flex its military might and you while away your spare moments re-living old battles in which British military power was the cornerstone of our empire-building heritage? I'm afraid those days are long gone and Europe has been at peace by and large for probably the longest period in history. That is no accident; it is precisely because of the creation of what we now call the EU that this has been made possible. Perhaps you think we should take up arms again and re-colonise America? Yes, I know that's ridiculous but no more so than the stuff you are now posting.
If you want to know the source of all the things there are to dislike in the UK, look no further than this infographic. There is the reason why Britain has fallen so far and the Germans and French have become so prosperous:
View attachment 17421
Tom
That was because they knew in advance that they would lose the case so were prepared to make the resigned statement. As I posted before the Supreme Court decision, the court had absolutely no choice but to find as it did.Was interesting post supreme court decision. Government were civil, professional and to the point.
it should have been 11 to nil.That was because they knew in advance that they would lose the case so were prepared to make the resigned statement. As I posted before the Supreme Court decision, the court had absolutely no choice but to find as it did.
In taking the case to the court, the government weren't hoping for miracles, they were just hoping to convince the public that they had some right on their side. They didn't have of course, they had no case at all.
.
Did indeed, my vocabulary is larger than my literacyPerhaps you meant 'opprobrium' rather than approbation 'Danidl'?
Tom