I didn't realise BBC were involved in paedophile exchange but I, ll take your word for it.
The BBC is, or was, the last remaining bastion of decency in UK. It once stood for something. It once had standards... You being happy with the decline of those standards is simply part of the problem. We no longer expect good behaviour from MPs or good standards of reporting from BBC.
I do agree, on scale of things its minor. Royal Family come out looking worse, big deal. But the fact we all must contribute to BBC for right to receive the sh! te they transmit whether we listen or watch or not is the issue. It's a tax. If BBC wants poor standards, support such as Bashir, Saville and god knows how many more Liberal left elite idiots that's fine but don't expect folk to pay the license fee. Its total freedom or license fee. They want best of both worlds. State help to pump out propoganda, support the unsupportable and turn blind eyes to crime.
Had this scandal been initiated by some private media, no problem. But from BBC?? Come on, get a grip. What's happened to Valerie Singleton, John Noakes and Blue Peter. Making porn films??? Or imaginary interviews about falsified documents?
Fact we aren't upset by BBC's behaviour over quite a few issues simply points out how bad they have got and how low our expectations are.
Members of BBC management in Manchester were aware of paedophile Stuart Hall's "inappropriate sexual conduct ", the Dame Janet Smith report finds.
www.bbc.co.uk
BBC reporting on itself, when it had to. Not when they first knew about it.