It was inevitable and why I forecast it after the referendum, which was our biggest own goal ever.This is not good news for the economy
Watch Frankfurt and Paris profit too.
.
It was inevitable and why I forecast it after the referendum, which was our biggest own goal ever.This is not good news for the economy
Number of antibodies is not necessarily a good measure.nobody disputes the benefit of spreading the stock of vaccine to more people. However, studies show that those who had the second jab have up to 4 times more antibodies than those with single jab.
Three.I believe you reported this one.
The drug I provided link to is Allocetra. Similar story.New Israeli Covid drug which cured 30 cases of disease hailed by scientists as 'huge breakthrough'
The EXO-CD24 substance was developed in Tel Aviv and successfully completed its first phase of clinical trials on Fridaywww.telegraph.co.uk
It seems they have found 2 drugs quite recently. Exo cd24 and Allocetra.??? Don't believe they are same..
Nah, I want a Cambridge vaccine.And, by gosh!, we can include the word "Oxford" when discussing it. The "Oxford steroid treatment". That fulfills the political requirement as well.
I think the tests are very unreliable and are recording very large numbers of false positives. As I've remarked elsewhere, the surface presence of the virus in the PCR test does not mean a person is infected, it merely means they were present in the air they breathed, but the test assumes they are infected.I've added Israel to the the countries I look at regularly on the Covid stats. As I noted resterday, it is way ahead of any other country on cumulative number of vaccinations per person, but I now see it is also second only to Czechia on number of new cases per person (7 day average).
Does anyone know why this is? On the face of things it doesn't make vaccination look that effective. It may partly be down to more rigorous testing and thus actually finding and recording cases?
Oxford keep talking about Isis. Very dodgy.Nah, I want a Cambridge vaccine.
It's all crap out of Oxford:
Boris Johnson, Theresa May, David Cameron, Tony Blair, Margaret Thatcher, need I go on?
Oxford can't even row along the Thames without sinking.
.
I agree they are unreliable but not sure how many are false positive rather than false negative?I think the tests are very unreliable and are recording very large numbers of false positives.
Inexpensive really does appear to be true:Three.
Asthma drug may reduce risk of severe Covid if taken early – study
Inhaled budesonide could become first treatment in early stages of infection if study confirmed
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/10/asthma-drug-budesonide-may-reduce-risk-severe-covid-if-taken-early-study
And, by gosh!, we can include the word "Oxford" when discussing it. The "Oxford steroid treatment". That fulfills the political requirement as well.
https://www.ouh.nhs.uk/research/patients/trials/stoic.aspx
Active ingredients | Size | Unit | NHS indicative price | Drug tariff | Drug tariff price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | dose (POM) | £14.25 | Part VIIIA Category C | £14.25 |
Trouble is that all the infected people carry on giving positives long after they've got rid of the infection. That's because the test reacts to the dead particles left after infection, not just to the live virus, so a second source of false positives as well as the surface presence one.I agree they are unreliable but not sure how many are false positive rather than false negative?
true, it's just one measure.Number of antibodies is not necessarily a good measure.
Careful your paranoia is showing. AZ make a very useful vaccine. Other health authorities around the world are delighted to have it. However some are more Prudent than in the UK and are stricting its use to those groups where the evidence is strong that it is effective and ensuring that it is applied in the manner which has been evidenced as being effective.This is what we’ve been saying since day one, set against the background noise of people on here shouting it down.
perhaps a little exaggerated.Sobering thought:
Good morning, Amelia Hill here bringing you the thought-provoking news that the director of the Covid-19 Genomics UK consortium, Sharon Peacock, has just told the BBC that the coronavirus variant first found in the British region of Kent is likely to sweep around the world and the battle with the virus is going to go on for at least a decade.
The Kent variant has “swept the country” and “it’s going to sweep the world, in all probability,” the head of the UK’s genetic surveillance programme said, told the BBC.
“Once we get on top of [the virus] or it mutates itself out of being virulent - causing disease - then we can stop worrying about it. But I think, looking in the future, we’re going to be doing this for years. We’re still going to be doing this 10 years down the line, in my view.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2021/feb/11/coronavirus-live-news-two-masks-substantially-reduce-exposure-italy-to-reopen-ski-resorts
Did you hear what she said or are you going on hearsay ( The Daily Mail being a well regarded impartial source for EU matters .) I would like to think I reported what she said yesterday.?Ursula von der Leyen says sorry over 'late' EU vaccine shambles
European commission president Ursula von der Leyen also conceded its rollout was still not 'where we want to be' in a humbling speech in Brussels.www.dailymail.co.uk
At least she has grace to apologise.??
I came across one of those odd medical you tube videos which in its own way might explain some of the anomalies. It was dated a number of months ago, when people were trying to get a grip. In full autopsies carried out on known fatal victims . All had heavy doses of CV19 in their lungs, but 1/4 had none in their nasal cavity . So when they were alive, they would have been false negatives.Trouble is that all the infected people carry on giving positives long after they've got rid of the infection. That's because the test reacts to the dead particles left after infection, not just to the live virus, so a second source of false positives as well as the surface presence one.
.
Unless it is a reverse correlation. And Asthma protects from CV19 and the inhaler is the indicator.Inexpensive really does appear to be true:
Pulmicort 100 Turbohaler (AstraZeneca UK Ltd)
Active ingredients Size Unit NHS indicative price Drug tariff Drug tariff price
- Budesonide 100 microgram per 1 dose
200 dose (POM) £14.25 Part VIIIA Category C £14.25
https://bnf.nice.org.uk/medicinal-forms/budesonide.html
Which is an interesting observation itself.All had heavy doses of CV19 in their lungs, but 1/4 had none in their nasal cavity .
The only point I quibble here is "It's a matter of political judgement". It should be a matter of medical/ clinical research judgement and then political decisionnobody disputes the benefit of spreading the stock of vaccine to more people. However, studies show that those who had the second jab have up to 4 times more antibodies than those with single jab.
If you have 30 millions doses (roughly what we would have until end of April), would you use them on 30 millions people or 15 millions of the most vulnerable?
It's a matter of political judgement.
What we criticise is government propaganda, pushing for single jabs while discretely give second jabs to Pfizer receivers.
The US CDC said that those who are properly vaccinated do not have to quarantine if coming into contact with someone who has covid.
Not all asthmatics get steroid-based medications. Some get by on, for example, ventolin or whatever alone.Unless it is a reverse correlation. And Asthma protects from CV19 and the inhaler is the indicator.