Brexit, for once some facts.

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,152
30,567
As a mobile app developer I have to pull you up on a few of those claims, flecc:
- 95% of the population have coverage. It's not geographical coverage, and it's not guaranteed good coverage all the time because mobile cells 'shrink' depending on how many people are using them (in London - a lot). Coverage is damped heavily indoors depending on brick walls, etc., but see below.*
- 84% of UK adults own a smartphone, so they can use apps. that's a pretty decent majority .

The 'utterly stupid way of designing apps' is driven by US companies in rivalry (Google & Apple). Having a universal set of programming interfaces (APIs) doesn't suit either, and why would they want to support a PC made by Microsoft? No money in it, no mobile angle.
But they notably pulled together to create Covid APIs for the benefit of the world - that's a rare step by them. However, the UK Covid app developers chose to ignore those APIs and tried to go their own way. Other app devs could see they were unhinged - on another planet - and we were shouting just like doctors shout at the TV about lockdown. They had to reverse that dumb decision after approx 3-4 months, vital months lost in the summer when numbers were low enough to implement test & trace. Not any more.

*If you buy a reasonable modern smartphone then you can use your WiFi as though you were connected to a mobile base station - it's seamless. Just look for VoWiFi support (Voice over WiFi). I recommend trying it, and I'd claim WiFi is therefore useful for coverage. even at home, not just at Starbucks, etc.
You're just the latest of a number who have replied on this while not knowing the circumstances.

I challenge that 95% have coverage, 95% of cells might have in parts but many within some of those cells individually don't have coverage, as in my case due to the contours of the steep sided valley I'm in. Here many of us are masked from the signal masts on the North Downs high points and also two local repeaters, therefore cells shown as having coverage don't have 100% coverage, so its 95% of far less than 95%.

And it's not just this older man suffering this, I'm in flats predominantly occupied by younger people who live on their latest smartphones when they can. But for many of them that means going outside and walking to the top of the hill to gain enough of a signal for calls and I see regular visitors who approach using a mobile waiting a short way off to complete their call or text before entering the area.

The networks are aware and many years ago wanted to provide an additional mast. But one idiot resident launched a campaign against it on the grounds of radiation (!) addling children's brains. He manage to raise such a fuss that the company withdrew, cancelling the plans. So we've been living in the mobile phone past for many years.

*If you buy a reasonable modern smartphone then you can use your WiFi as though you were connected to a mobile base station - it's seamless. Just look for VoWiFi support (Voice over WiFi). I recommend trying it, and I'd claim WiFi is therefore useful for coverage. even at home, not just at Starbucks, etc.
I have had a modern smartphone for a few months now, a Motorola G6 given by a spendthrift younger friend who bought it, changed his mind immediately and bought something more expensive. So with no signal I tried the WiFi route but without success since connection is rarely possible and suffering frequent dropouts. My router is of preference hardwired to computer, Smart TV, FreeviewPlay recorder etc with its wireless facility normally turned off, but I turned it on and set it up but still had no success with WiFi. To underline all this, most of our SmartMeters don't work either since they are mobile network dependent.

Because I'm old many assume I'm technophobic, but nothing could be further from the truth. I've been computing for decades, was for two years a leading advisor on Microsoft operating systems on the PC Advisor website, use SatNav, bought a mobile nearly two decades ago for emergency use when out, the heating and lighting in my home and even garage are all remote controlled and I drive a fully electric car.

I love new technology that works and set everything up myself, but hate that which doesn't work properly, and smartphones definitely fall under category. The Motorola drives me bonkers due to its failure to respond reliably to commands. Just one example, because without a signal it would rarely be any use I wouldnt want be charging it every two or three days so want to power it right down. To do that means pressing the on/of button and selecting power off from the three choices that are supposed to be given on screen.

But almost all the time that doesn't happen, instead I'm asked "Do I want to restart" but with no option to choose no and no swipe command to reach that option! That is stupid design. So I have to press the off button and try again. After anything from five to nine attempts I finally do get the Power Off choice, but more often that not choosing that returns me to "Do I want to restart", starting the whole useless cycle again!

At that point if the designer responsibly was in front of me they would need an ambulance, such is my built up exasperation. What else in this world takes so much time and effort just to turn it off? Not that other touch screen commands on Smartphones are much more successful. All around I see owners swiping repeatedly in their efforts to get what they want or what they want happen. The same when they want to show me something on their phone. Lose it and I have to watch them furiously swiping for ages to try to get it back.

They mostly seem happy with this, but I'm not. I'm only interested in technology that works first time, every time, and in this respect smartphones and many other touch screen items are a failed technology in many respects, despite their immense popularity and usefulness for some.

If I had many genuine uses for a smartphone I might be inclined to pursue other options or stand outside in the cold and wet at the top of the hill, but for one app to contact a doctor with a stupidly designed App, no way.

You see, despite your protest it is stupidly designed. That doctor had a very good website which I always used for prescription repeats and other contact. But their "Doctor IQ" app propaganda has been superimposed across the home page, blocking all access buttons. To make matters worse at the end of the app description urging me to download it is the sentence, "for those who cannot use the app, all the other ways to contact can still be used", when very clearly that is untrue and just another bit of smartphone idiocy.
.
 
Last edited:

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
As a mobile app developer I have to pull you up on a few of those claims, flecc:
- 95% of the population have coverage. It's not geographical coverage, and it's not guaranteed good coverage all the time because mobile cells 'shrink' depending on how many people are using them (in London - a lot). Coverage is damped heavily indoors depending on brick walls, etc., but see below.*
- 84% of UK adults own a smartphone, so they can use apps. that's a pretty decent majority .

The 'utterly stupid way of designing apps' is driven by US companies in rivalry (Google & Apple). Having a universal set of programming interfaces (APIs) doesn't suit either, and why would they want to support a PC made by Microsoft? No money in it, no mobile angle.
But they notably pulled together to create Covid APIs for the benefit of the world - that's a rare step by them. However, the UK Covid app developers chose to ignore those APIs and tried to go their own way. Other app devs could see they were unhinged - on another planet - and we were shouting just like doctors shout at the TV about lockdown. They had to reverse that dumb decision after approx 3-4 months, vital months lost in the summer when numbers were low enough to implement test & trace. Not any more.

*If you buy a reasonable modern smartphone then you can use your WiFi as though you were connected to a mobile base station - it's seamless. Just look for VoWiFi support (Voice over WiFi). I recommend trying it, and I'd claim WiFi is therefore useful for coverage. even at home, not just at Starbucks, etc.
Thank you for that timely and very relevant post, much appreciated! :cool:
 

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
And there's a matter of where did the money go?

The Irish Test and Trace cost £775,000
The Welsh Test and Trace cost £102 million
England test and trace cost 22 BILLION!!!!


Paul Emanuelli@UnpubWrites


The protective wall around Dido Harding seems to be the most effective measure undertaken by government. #r4today hasn’t even mentioned the head of test and trace by name for about 4 months.
:cool:
 
  • Informative
Reactions: flecc and oyster

Jesus H Christ

Esteemed Pedelecer
Dec 31, 2020
1,363
2,206
China is refusing to allow WHO inspectors to investigate the source of the Coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan.

The filthy little yellow bastards started this Coronavirus pandemic. The rest of the world should start to apply sanctions and begin moving trade out of China. Inside 20 years the Chinese could be driven back to grazing on rice and mud.
 
  • :D
Reactions: POLLY

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
Reader comment in the Daily Mail
"
Earl_of_Essex, Tudor England, United Kingdom, less than a minute ago

I don't regret voting for a Conservative government, I just regret not getting one."

Am I permitted to say
"You won, get over it?" :D
 
  • :D
Reactions: POLLY and oyster

oldgroaner

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 15, 2015
23,461
32,613
80
China is refusing to allow WHO inspectors to investigate the source of the Coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan.

The filthy little yellow bastards started this Coronavirus pandemic. The rest of the world should start to apply sanctions and begin moving trade out of China. Inside 20 years the Chinese could be driven back to grazing on rice and mud.
There's nothing like being diplomatic is there?:cool:

If I might draw attention to a tiny flaw, if we stop taking any manufactured items from China
We will be eating cabbages and mud :D
 
Last edited:

Jesus H Christ

Esteemed Pedelecer
Dec 31, 2020
1,363
2,206
We have 11400 pharmacies across the U.K. where staff are trained in administering vaccines. According to the Pharmaceutical Negotiating Service, that’s enough to administer 1.3 million vaccinations per week. Their offer to help with Coronavirus inoculation has been blanked by the government. This is beginning to sound like PPE all over again. If you remember, specialist PPE companies like ARCO were initially turned down in favour of pub landlords, jewellers and accountancy firms.

The government seems set on massive vaccination sites like stadiums and major hospitals. Is it really wise to encourage high volumes of people to converge on one spot like a hospital during a highly infectious global pandemic?

Would a network smaller sites like pharmacies, dentists, doctors surgeries, village hall and even fire stations be better? I can only think there is some dirty cash for the governments chums in setting up these big vaccination centres. Surely, finding a small to medium scale vaccination procedure which works, and then replicating it at a large scale would make more sense.

**** up n+1 is on the way.
 

oyster

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 7, 2017
10,422
14,609
West West Wales
We have 11400 pharmacies across the U.K. where staff are trained in administering vaccines. According to the Pharmaceutical Negotiating Service, that’s enough to administer 1.3 million vaccinations per week. Their offer to help with Coronavirus inoculation has been blanked by the government. This is beginning to sound like PPE all over again. If you remember, specialist PPE companies like ARCO were initially turned down in favour of pub landlords, jewellers and accountancy firms.

The government seems set on massive vaccination sites like stadiums and major hospitals. Is it really wise to encourage high volumes of people to converge on one spot like a hospital during a highly infectious global pandemic?

Would a network smaller sites like pharmacies, dentists, doctors surgeries, village hall and even fire stations be better? I can only think there is some dirty cash for the governments chums in setting up these big vaccination centres. Surely, finding a small to medium scale vaccination procedure which works, and then replicating it at a large scale would make more sense.

**** up n+1 is on the way.
Boots and Tesco have offered help. No idea if it has been taken up - but likely not.

And they have been using local rugby club for influenza vaccines recently.
 

Woosh

Trade Member
May 19, 2012
20,323
16,849
Southend on Sea
wooshbikes.co.uk
I think the current problem is delivery.
Pfizer and AZ have to ramp up production and vials are on short supply.
 

oyster

Esteemed Pedelecer
Nov 7, 2017
10,422
14,609
West West Wales
The manufacturers say not. That excuse is the governments joker card for when they fail to deliver. They primed us with it two weeks ago.
The issue was known and being discussed in May 2019. This article from September 2019 discusses the issues:

The world's leading vial manufacturers are, perhaps unsurprisingly, optimistic. Their joint statement from June was upbeat, if short on details. "We will do everything to support any upcoming COVID-19 vaccine campaigns," said Dietmar Siemssen, chief executive of Gerresheimer AG. Schott chairman Dr Frank Heinricht promised his company would "do our utmost to provide the required containers."
https://www.businessinsider.com/covid-19-vaccine-experts-warn-glass-vials-planes-storage-shortage-2020-9?r=US&IR=T
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Nev and Woosh

Jesus H Christ

Esteemed Pedelecer
Dec 31, 2020
1,363
2,206
Our joy never ends...

81,000 UK-owned .eu domains suspended as Brexit transition ends

The UK lost its right to a .eu website when it left the European bloc, leaving many domain name owners in limbo.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/81000-uk-owned-eu-domains-suspended-as-brexit-transition-ends/

Shame Limbo isn't a member of the EU...
I’ve lost my .eu domain name. Luckily, I don’t use it very frequently.

The German based hosting company gave no warning, they just chopped it. No word regarding when they are going to refund me for the service I’ve paid for in advance, but they are no longer providing.
 

flecc

Member
Oct 25, 2006
53,152
30,567
China is refusing to allow WHO inspectors to investigate the source of the Coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan.

The filthy little yellow bastards started this Coronavirus pandemic. The rest of the world should start to apply sanctions and begin moving trade out of China. Inside 20 years the Chinese could be driven back to grazing on rice and mud.
Are you sure it's not the French to blame?

After all, a chunk of that region was long known as French Indo-China. ;)
.
 

Advertisers